Chris Fourie
@robobonobo.bsky.social
MLOps / research engineer in digital health, medical doctor
Research interests: collective intelligence, complexity science, NeuroAI
Grassroots independent research community co-founder, SisonkeBiotik
More at https://www.chrisfourie.africa/
Research interests: collective intelligence, complexity science, NeuroAI
Grassroots independent research community co-founder, SisonkeBiotik
More at https://www.chrisfourie.africa/
What is the meaning of "sufficient" here?
e.g. along the lines of "All models are wrong, but some are useful"
I read this then as potentially "All definitions are insufficient, but some may facilitate research"
Is this the intended meaning? Or rather "Some definitions are insufficient..." ?
e.g. along the lines of "All models are wrong, but some are useful"
I read this then as potentially "All definitions are insufficient, but some may facilitate research"
Is this the intended meaning? Or rather "Some definitions are insufficient..." ?
June 2, 2025 at 12:32 PM
What is the meaning of "sufficient" here?
e.g. along the lines of "All models are wrong, but some are useful"
I read this then as potentially "All definitions are insufficient, but some may facilitate research"
Is this the intended meaning? Or rather "Some definitions are insufficient..." ?
e.g. along the lines of "All models are wrong, but some are useful"
I read this then as potentially "All definitions are insufficient, but some may facilitate research"
Is this the intended meaning? Or rather "Some definitions are insufficient..." ?
e.g. It could be interesting, to use an approach like this to create a broader dynamic/ongoing survey where one could cite a snapshot in time of the results - giving one an emergent definition from a specific social network for an important technical term
June 2, 2025 at 12:22 PM
e.g. It could be interesting, to use an approach like this to create a broader dynamic/ongoing survey where one could cite a snapshot in time of the results - giving one an emergent definition from a specific social network for an important technical term
bsky.app/profile/anna...
A focused subset of AI researchers on the definition of "intelligence". One systematic approach at least to investigate implicit consensus for language/knowledge - Perhaps a step towards an explicit ontology that researchers in the space could use/cite when writing
A focused subset of AI researchers on the definition of "intelligence". One systematic approach at least to investigate implicit consensus for language/knowledge - Perhaps a step towards an explicit ontology that researchers in the space could use/cite when writing
🤯 We use the term 'intelligence' a lot, but wth do we mean?
We got 303 survey responses from researchers. The most agreed-on criteria are generalization, adaptability & reasoning.
ACL Findings preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2505.20959
with @brtrm.bsky.social @terne.bsky.social @heinrichst.bsky.social /1
We got 303 survey responses from researchers. The most agreed-on criteria are generalization, adaptability & reasoning.
ACL Findings preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2505.20959
with @brtrm.bsky.social @terne.bsky.social @heinrichst.bsky.social /1
June 2, 2025 at 12:09 PM
bsky.app/profile/anna...
A focused subset of AI researchers on the definition of "intelligence". One systematic approach at least to investigate implicit consensus for language/knowledge - Perhaps a step towards an explicit ontology that researchers in the space could use/cite when writing
A focused subset of AI researchers on the definition of "intelligence". One systematic approach at least to investigate implicit consensus for language/knowledge - Perhaps a step towards an explicit ontology that researchers in the space could use/cite when writing