AJ 'Threats' McKenna
@robertgalbraith.bsky.social
I used to just write poems. Now I illustrate them too and turn them into comics. You can buy my first one here: https://ko-fi.com/s/943b7dfafd
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
They should invent a government that isn’t senile pedophile adolf hitler
November 14, 2025 at 4:59 AM
They should invent a government that isn’t senile pedophile adolf hitler
Farage is a diddler
November 14, 2025 at 6:39 AM
Farage is a diddler
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
For one thing, bodily autonomy is bodily autonomy. Children's rights are children's rights.
Rejecting both is essential to allow men like Epstein to exist, so they reject both. It's not them being hypocritical, it's them being consistent.
Rejecting both is essential to allow men like Epstein to exist, so they reject both. It's not them being hypocritical, it's them being consistent.
November 14, 2025 at 5:59 AM
For one thing, bodily autonomy is bodily autonomy. Children's rights are children's rights.
Rejecting both is essential to allow men like Epstein to exist, so they reject both. It's not them being hypocritical, it's them being consistent.
Rejecting both is essential to allow men like Epstein to exist, so they reject both. It's not them being hypocritical, it's them being consistent.
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
Megyn Kelly, who is a danger to her children, is being perfectly consistent by simultaneously declaring trans people innate sexual predators *and* defending the world's most famous sexual predator.
November 14, 2025 at 5:56 AM
Megyn Kelly, who is a danger to her children, is being perfectly consistent by simultaneously declaring trans people innate sexual predators *and* defending the world's most famous sexual predator.
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
In their ideal society, wealthy men can prey upon young women and children, without consequence. And less wealthy men can prey upon trans people, without consequence.
It's not hypocrisy that they instantly started defending Epstein, it's consistency. Both are necessary parts of their ideal world
It's not hypocrisy that they instantly started defending Epstein, it's consistency. Both are necessary parts of their ideal world
November 14, 2025 at 5:53 AM
In their ideal society, wealthy men can prey upon young women and children, without consequence. And less wealthy men can prey upon trans people, without consequence.
It's not hypocrisy that they instantly started defending Epstein, it's consistency. Both are necessary parts of their ideal world
It's not hypocrisy that they instantly started defending Epstein, it's consistency. Both are necessary parts of their ideal world
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
These people got massive paychecks, for years, floating their unprofitable outlets where they shrieked about groomers and did stochastic terrorism against trans people.
And now, they're doing the "actually it's ephebophilia" bit because that is just as crucial a part of the hierarchy they uphold.
And now, they're doing the "actually it's ephebophilia" bit because that is just as crucial a part of the hierarchy they uphold.
November 14, 2025 at 5:51 AM
These people got massive paychecks, for years, floating their unprofitable outlets where they shrieked about groomers and did stochastic terrorism against trans people.
And now, they're doing the "actually it's ephebophilia" bit because that is just as crucial a part of the hierarchy they uphold.
And now, they're doing the "actually it's ephebophilia" bit because that is just as crucial a part of the hierarchy they uphold.
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
It was always inevitable that the loudest and best-funded (by people in Epstein's emails) anti-trans freaks who spent years trying to brand trans people as sexual predators, would instantly start defending Epstein.
It's not hypocrisy, it's them reinforcing their hierarchy.
It's not hypocrisy, it's them reinforcing their hierarchy.
November 14, 2025 at 5:49 AM
It was always inevitable that the loudest and best-funded (by people in Epstein's emails) anti-trans freaks who spent years trying to brand trans people as sexual predators, would instantly start defending Epstein.
It's not hypocrisy, it's them reinforcing their hierarchy.
It's not hypocrisy, it's them reinforcing their hierarchy.
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
Not to put too fine a point on it, but they way they *get* annoyed at people, and how they *decide* who to be annoyed at, is through social media.
This future is Thomas Chatterton Williams arguing in the Atlantic with ten Twitter leftists who called him 'Whomas Thateterton Cilliams' forever.
This future is Thomas Chatterton Williams arguing in the Atlantic with ten Twitter leftists who called him 'Whomas Thateterton Cilliams' forever.
legitimately i think one of the core failings of centrist pundits is that they have come to define themselves by what they are against--to chart their intellectual course by who they think is being annoying this week--instead of by recourse to genuine principle
November 14, 2025 at 5:54 AM
Not to put too fine a point on it, but they way they *get* annoyed at people, and how they *decide* who to be annoyed at, is through social media.
This future is Thomas Chatterton Williams arguing in the Atlantic with ten Twitter leftists who called him 'Whomas Thateterton Cilliams' forever.
This future is Thomas Chatterton Williams arguing in the Atlantic with ten Twitter leftists who called him 'Whomas Thateterton Cilliams' forever.
For life to survive on this planet, cis hetero white patriarchy must be destroyed
November 14, 2025 at 5:58 AM
For life to survive on this planet, cis hetero white patriarchy must be destroyed
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
Anyway: pornographic art and performance is good, people have a right to the vast majority of their kinks, and it is ridiculous that consenting adults are finding those rights strangled by big tech and payment platforms
November 14, 2025 at 12:00 AM
Anyway: pornographic art and performance is good, people have a right to the vast majority of their kinks, and it is ridiculous that consenting adults are finding those rights strangled by big tech and payment platforms
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
There has been a noticeable reticence in left and liberal circles to voice full-throated support for pornography, even as it's become increasingly clear what the open end goals of the censorship movement are
In a lot of ways other leftists chose this path folks. They shrugged and didn’t care when Patreon banned a ton of hypnosis and TF creators, or when YouTube started their ASMR crackdown. Now it’s coming for queer porn creators, more and more. Who will stand up?
November 13, 2025 at 11:46 PM
There has been a noticeable reticence in left and liberal circles to voice full-throated support for pornography, even as it's become increasingly clear what the open end goals of the censorship movement are
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
The designating of things “porn” is only for power over people/communication and has nothing to do with art. You give the right an inch on this and you fucking lose.
There has been a noticeable reticence in left and liberal circles to voice full-throated support for pornography, even as it's become increasingly clear what the open end goals of the censorship movement are
In a lot of ways other leftists chose this path folks. They shrugged and didn’t care when Patreon banned a ton of hypnosis and TF creators, or when YouTube started their ASMR crackdown. Now it’s coming for queer porn creators, more and more. Who will stand up?
November 14, 2025 at 5:43 AM
The designating of things “porn” is only for power over people/communication and has nothing to do with art. You give the right an inch on this and you fucking lose.
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
Trump knew about the rape if young girls at the Epstein residence and said nothing, yet he claims to be “protecting women and girls” by attacking trans people.
November 14, 2025 at 4:50 AM
Trump knew about the rape if young girls at the Epstein residence and said nothing, yet he claims to be “protecting women and girls” by attacking trans people.
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
While you can't blame every journalist trying to do good work & make a living for the institutional failure of the corporations that pay them, it's wild to see NYT contributors losing their absolute shit that anyone would dare question their integrity or wonder if they were complicit in the coverup
November 13, 2025 at 10:53 PM
While you can't blame every journalist trying to do good work & make a living for the institutional failure of the corporations that pay them, it's wild to see NYT contributors losing their absolute shit that anyone would dare question their integrity or wonder if they were complicit in the coverup
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
Like really, it's beyond the pale, unreasonably offensive, straining credulity that you might be a bit tarnished because you worked for an institution that smeared trans people while covering up rich pedophiles and enabling fascism. Really? It's incomprehensibly insulting? Really.
November 13, 2025 at 10:54 PM
Like really, it's beyond the pale, unreasonably offensive, straining credulity that you might be a bit tarnished because you worked for an institution that smeared trans people while covering up rich pedophiles and enabling fascism. Really? It's incomprehensibly insulting? Really.
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
Those of us who are SA survivors are used to the mass shrug in response to even the most overt evidence of horrific behavior. Epstein's crimes and the complicity of many influential figures involved have been known for decades (’05 to be exact). It's never mustered much interest or consequence.
November 14, 2025 at 3:50 AM
Those of us who are SA survivors are used to the mass shrug in response to even the most overt evidence of horrific behavior. Epstein's crimes and the complicity of many influential figures involved have been known for decades (’05 to be exact). It's never mustered much interest or consequence.
Tyson, by the way, is probably where bird flu is gonna come from when it hits
Alt text
November 14, 2025 at 5:47 AM
Tyson, by the way, is probably where bird flu is gonna come from when it hits
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
LA:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
DC:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
Chicago:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
Charlotte:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
- black mayor
- majority non-white
DC:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
Chicago:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
Charlotte:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
Gregory Bovino, the top Border Patrol official leading the charge on the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in cities, and his officers are heading to Charlotte, according to a source familiar with the planning. That was news to city officials. https://cnn.it/49crpZT
November 14, 2025 at 3:09 AM
LA:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
DC:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
Chicago:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
Charlotte:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
- black mayor
- majority non-white
DC:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
Chicago:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
Charlotte:
- black mayor
- majority non-white
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
sexual violence is THE patriarchal technology of oppression. wherever there is any kind of oppression--colonialism, genocide, capitalism, the state, the police--there is sexual violence as its frontline operative mechanism. the child is THE archetypal object of legitimate disciplinary violence.
November 14, 2025 at 5:07 AM
sexual violence is THE patriarchal technology of oppression. wherever there is any kind of oppression--colonialism, genocide, capitalism, the state, the police--there is sexual violence as its frontline operative mechanism. the child is THE archetypal object of legitimate disciplinary violence.
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
It's hard not to be angry about this, how queer people are smeared by people actively covering up the crimes of pedophiles and rapists and child abusers.
November 14, 2025 at 1:25 AM
It's hard not to be angry about this, how queer people are smeared by people actively covering up the crimes of pedophiles and rapists and child abusers.
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
Thatcher's government did this with Section 28, banned the "promotion of homosexuality" as a danger to children, while actively protecting Jimmy Savile and who knows how many other pedophiles. It's the same damn playbook.
I cannot begin to properly articulate how upsetting it is to have had people baselessly accuse trans people of being groomers and pedophiles only for it to come out that they were deliberately doing this as part of a project to provide cover to actual groomers and pedophiles in positions of power
November 14, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Thatcher's government did this with Section 28, banned the "promotion of homosexuality" as a danger to children, while actively protecting Jimmy Savile and who knows how many other pedophiles. It's the same damn playbook.
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
I cannot begin to properly articulate how upsetting it is to have had people baselessly accuse trans people of being groomers and pedophiles only for it to come out that they were deliberately doing this as part of a project to provide cover to actual groomers and pedophiles in positions of power
November 13, 2025 at 9:22 PM
I cannot begin to properly articulate how upsetting it is to have had people baselessly accuse trans people of being groomers and pedophiles only for it to come out that they were deliberately doing this as part of a project to provide cover to actual groomers and pedophiles in positions of power
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
when you understand that patriarchy views children as sexual property it all makes sense. there's no hypocrisy. exposure to queerness & transness threatens to "corrupt" the father's property, to "lead them astray" into self-determination, to taint their future sexual value. CSA is permissible as >
Thatcher's government did this with Section 28, banned the "promotion of homosexuality" as a danger to children, while actively protecting Jimmy Savile and who knows how many other pedophiles. It's the same damn playbook.
I cannot begin to properly articulate how upsetting it is to have had people baselessly accuse trans people of being groomers and pedophiles only for it to come out that they were deliberately doing this as part of a project to provide cover to actual groomers and pedophiles in positions of power
November 14, 2025 at 4:56 AM
when you understand that patriarchy views children as sexual property it all makes sense. there's no hypocrisy. exposure to queerness & transness threatens to "corrupt" the father's property, to "lead them astray" into self-determination, to taint their future sexual value. CSA is permissible as >
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
when RWers say "grooming" they mean "threatening my patriarchal sexual authority, corrupting my property, damaging my goods." they don't actually mean anything to do with sexual abuse, which they see as perfectly permissible under the right circumstances.
November 14, 2025 at 5:02 AM
when RWers say "grooming" they mean "threatening my patriarchal sexual authority, corrupting my property, damaging my goods." they don't actually mean anything to do with sexual abuse, which they see as perfectly permissible under the right circumstances.
Reposted by AJ 'Threats' McKenna
we have GOT to stop thinking about this in terms of hypocrisy because that's not what's going on! we NEED to understand why pedo apologia is so rampant in anti-trans pseudoscience, why abuse is so rampant in the home, why child marriage is still legal across the country etc.
November 14, 2025 at 5:05 AM
we have GOT to stop thinking about this in terms of hypocrisy because that's not what's going on! we NEED to understand why pedo apologia is so rampant in anti-trans pseudoscience, why abuse is so rampant in the home, why child marriage is still legal across the country etc.