@rippahseviltwin.bsky.social
I thought I was in line for popcorn but now I’m on the rollercoaster.
🇨🇦🏴☠️
🇨🇦🏴☠️
Brian Glenn to Mohammed bone Sawman: "Don't you have a suit?"
November 21, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Brian Glenn to Mohammed bone Sawman: "Don't you have a suit?"
Leavitt is a vile, lying, exhausting sack of shit.
Push back every day!!!
Push back every day!!!
March 31, 2025 at 7:38 PM
Leavitt is a vile, lying, exhausting sack of shit.
Push back every day!!!
Push back every day!!!
Jesus Christ! The world is being destroyed by a bunch of fucking babies.
March 11, 2025 at 5:51 AM
Jesus Christ! The world is being destroyed by a bunch of fucking babies.
Soon? Sorry, the destruction and denigration of education has been going on for a long, long time. Duhmerica is already one of the most shamefully ignorant countries. “Shameful” because it’s deliberate.
March 10, 2025 at 5:09 PM
Soon? Sorry, the destruction and denigration of education has been going on for a long, long time. Duhmerica is already one of the most shamefully ignorant countries. “Shameful” because it’s deliberate.
I won't be angry if some one corrects my math.
I used the Dec-Jan numbers as an estimate for the coming year. Total yearly estimate to be captured at the border: 0.18 lbs
$1.3 B in enhanced border security. $1.9 Million cost per ounce of reduction.
How fucking crazy is that?
I used the Dec-Jan numbers as an estimate for the coming year. Total yearly estimate to be captured at the border: 0.18 lbs
$1.3 B in enhanced border security. $1.9 Million cost per ounce of reduction.
How fucking crazy is that?
March 9, 2025 at 1:29 AM
I won't be angry if some one corrects my math.
I used the Dec-Jan numbers as an estimate for the coming year. Total yearly estimate to be captured at the border: 0.18 lbs
$1.3 B in enhanced border security. $1.9 Million cost per ounce of reduction.
How fucking crazy is that?
I used the Dec-Jan numbers as an estimate for the coming year. Total yearly estimate to be captured at the border: 0.18 lbs
$1.3 B in enhanced border security. $1.9 Million cost per ounce of reduction.
How fucking crazy is that?
The Reagan administration repealed the Fairness Doctrine in 1987. That paved the way for talk radio and all the rest of this shit.
You're a little late to light that bulb.
You're a little late to light that bulb.
March 9, 2025 at 12:50 AM
The Reagan administration repealed the Fairness Doctrine in 1987. That paved the way for talk radio and all the rest of this shit.
You're a little late to light that bulb.
You're a little late to light that bulb.
This is profoundly disturbing because it speaks to how desperate things will need to get for everyone before that alternate reality cracks.
Fuck.
Fuck.
February 16, 2025 at 3:40 AM
This is profoundly disturbing because it speaks to how desperate things will need to get for everyone before that alternate reality cracks.
Fuck.
Fuck.
Gnomelander!!!
Ha-ha!
Ha-ha!
February 16, 2025 at 12:46 AM
Gnomelander!!!
Ha-ha!
Ha-ha!
That's an excellent idea!
February 16, 2025 at 12:43 AM
That's an excellent idea!
My bad. I should have looked up "reconquista".
In that case, yes, Idaho should be included. But not BC.
The problem seems to be separation cannot be determined by state and provincial lines but a much more nuanced division. Walling off cities above x-number might be the way to go.
In that case, yes, Idaho should be included. But not BC.
The problem seems to be separation cannot be determined by state and provincial lines but a much more nuanced division. Walling off cities above x-number might be the way to go.
February 11, 2025 at 7:20 PM
My bad. I should have looked up "reconquista".
In that case, yes, Idaho should be included. But not BC.
The problem seems to be separation cannot be determined by state and provincial lines but a much more nuanced division. Walling off cities above x-number might be the way to go.
In that case, yes, Idaho should be included. But not BC.
The problem seems to be separation cannot be determined by state and provincial lines but a much more nuanced division. Walling off cities above x-number might be the way to go.