But giving it a 2/10 just comes off as a stunt for attention, I'm sorry.
But giving it a 2/10 just comes off as a stunt for attention, I'm sorry.
The developers at Embark are likely over the moon right now.
www.pcgamer.com/games/third-...
The developers at Embark are likely over the moon right now.
www.pcgamer.com/games/third-...
Really dont know where this belief comes from.
Really dont know where this belief comes from.
think this is another example of the bsky scolds really hurting this site, as anyone who posts anything about a microsoft game gets immediately swarmed here.
think this is another example of the bsky scolds really hurting this site, as anyone who posts anything about a microsoft game gets immediately swarmed here.
But like, what exactly do we need to achieve for RPS, Kotaku, Polygon, IGN, Gamespot, etc etc to acknowledge us anymore?
How the heck are smaller teams meant to get the word out?
I saw them both once and thought they were was good, but there are so many people compeletely obsessed with these movies.
I saw them both once and thought they were was good, but there are so many people compeletely obsessed with these movies.
Lol also the idea that comparing two similtanious alphas for live service shooter is "garbage" is also very silly.
Lol also the idea that comparing two similtanious alphas for live service shooter is "garbage" is also very silly.
They initially gave it a 5/10 in early access and he made mutiple videos about how unfair that was and IGN would never re-review for 1.0
Then they did re-review it and lowered the score to a 4.
Thats all this is about
They initially gave it a 5/10 in early access and he made mutiple videos about how unfair that was and IGN would never re-review for 1.0
Then they did re-review it and lowered the score to a 4.
Thats all this is about