Indeed, a very poor job. But doing nothing is maybe not a job title per se - but that's of course something those who don't exist tend to do.

I don't mind him continuing to expose his stupidity.

This is too stupid to even dignify with a serious response. Your argument is so logically bankrupt that it doesn't even qualify as an argument.

Laughing and throwing around baseless accusations doesn’t strengthen your argument—it just makes it clear you’re running out of things to say.

5/5

Your attempt to twist my words into some kind of inconsistency only shows how desperate you are to score a point instead of engaging in an honest discussion.
Finally, calling my atheism 'fake' doesn’t make it so. My lack of belief in gods is real, whether you like it or not.

4/5

My position is consistent: I see no evidence for any gods, including yours. That’s not 'changing my tune'; it’s simply rejecting unsupported claims across the board.

3/5

If you have something specific and verifiable that points uniquely to your God (and not any other deity or natural explanation), feel free to share it. Otherwise, this is just noise.
Second, I never claimed no other gods exist.

2/5

First, claiming that 'every evidence in the universe is evidence for your God' is still just empty rhetoric. Repeating it doesn’t make it more valid—it just highlights the lack of actual evidence.

1/5

If you have actual, specific evidence that uniquely supports the existence of your god (and not any other deity or natural explanation), feel free to present it. Otherwise, blanket statements like this are just empty rhetoric.

4/4

By that logic, I could just as easily claim that 'every evidence in the universe is evidence for no gods,' and we'd be at a stalemate of nonsense.

3/4

For something to serve as evidence, it must point uniquely to one conclusion over others. Otherwise, you're just labeling the entire universe with your preconceived belief.

2/4

Claiming that 'every evidence in the universe is evidence for God' is a nice-sounding phrase, but it’s ultimately meaningless without specifics. If everything is evidence for God, then nothing is—because evidence requires contrast.

1/4

My lack of belief in a god is real, regardless of whether you agree with it or not. If you have evidence to support your claims about God, feel free to share it. Otherwise, dismissing my position as 'fake' doesn't contribute anything meaningful to the discussion.

4/4

I can be an agnostic atheist, meaning I don't claim to know for certain whether a god exists but see no evidence to justify belief in one.

Claiming that 'atheists don't exist' is nonsensical.

3/4

Atheism is simply the lack of belief in a god, while agnosticism refers to a lack of knowledge or certainty about the existence of a god. The two are not mutually exclusive—

2/4

Your confusion seems to stem from a misunderstanding of the terms 'atheist' and 'agnostic.' Atheism and agnosticism address two different things: belief and knowledge.

1/4