this is what Dem donors wanted to do with the "mini-primary"

thank you for the clarification. i assume the Senate language will prevail, so that's a relief

the HHS funding bill is the one that had the trans care Hyde amendment in it, right? if that's been dropped then that's a huge relief

id never post a youtube video again if i got a debunk this serious

yep

Andy Harris is already saying he's a no if the anti-hemp provision *gets taken out* so yeah this could get very funny

i fear that the likes of Golden, Cuellar, MGP etc. will give Johnson a bigger margin of error, but yeah, it's tight

also have to wonder if Trump pitches a fit when he learns that the CR contains anti-RIF provisions

also entirely possible that we just end up back in this situation in January anyway, especially after the "promised" vote

what was the other time they've gotten an early call wrong? i definitely always felt like they call races way too early, but i didn't know this wasn't the first time it'd bitten them in the ass

answered my own question by looking at the petition: seems like it'd block the difference rather than all payments

i think my question here is if an injunction from SCOTUS would block *all* payments or just the difference between the previously-court-ordered partial payments and the full payments

the amount of political commentators who cannot figure out the very basic politics at play here is maddening

friend of mine in Michigan confirmed to me that she sees a balance in her SNAP account now, yeah. had some very colorful words for Vance lol