It already is in SoCal

After reading the complaint, seems more like a fraud claim for probate. I understand there were issues with the couple noted transactions, but the larger issue is the trust/fiduciary stuff

Question… does potential fraud change the requirement of mandatory arbitration? I would assume if you have been defrauded, you wouldn’t still be required to arbitrate with the persons who are defrauding you?

Damn… u had to put it in perspective… ugh

Needless to say that the Seidler Brothers will not be safe at Petco, I wouldn’t wanna be them. Sheryl is believed in this city.

From your legal understanding, is she standing on fairly firm ground?

Mensie, who are her lawyers filing the suit? Reputable?