Raphael Robert
@raphaelrobert.bsky.social
Privacy. Security. Research.
MLS co-author, working in secure messaging at @phoenixrd.bsky.social.
MLS co-author, working in secure messaging at @phoenixrd.bsky.social.
I think it's a different set of tradeoffs (as is always the case in decentralized environments). So the short answer would be: yes.
October 29, 2025 at 10:09 PM
I think it's a different set of tradeoffs (as is always the case in decentralized environments). So the short answer would be: yes.
Yes. E2EE would be undermined in one way or another.
August 28, 2025 at 8:01 PM
Yes. E2EE would be undermined in one way or another.
Reposted by Raphael Robert
The idea that you can just “teach computer science” and be apolitical is a beautiful dream that expired in the 2000s, at the latest. Computer science has re-organized every facet of our society: it is inherently political. Instead of taking this idea seriously, we ran from it. Now we live in hell.
May 3, 2025 at 3:27 PM
The idea that you can just “teach computer science” and be apolitical is a beautiful dream that expired in the 2000s, at the latest. Computer science has re-organized every facet of our society: it is inherently political. Instead of taking this idea seriously, we ran from it. Now we live in hell.
It's an informational draft, so I think it cannot use normative language, but adding @mallory.techpolicy.social.ap.brid.gy and @claucece.bsky.social who actually wrote this.
May 2, 2025 at 6:27 PM
It's an informational draft, so I think it cannot use normative language, but adding @mallory.techpolicy.social.ap.brid.gy and @claucece.bsky.social who actually wrote this.
There has been an attempt by Knodel et al to have a more rigorous definition over at the IETF: www.ietf.org/archive/id/d...
Definition of End-to-end Encryption
This document provides a definition of end-to-end encryption (E2EE) from both the perspective of a regular internet user as well as from the perspective of required properties for implementers.
www.ietf.org
May 2, 2025 at 4:00 PM
There has been an attempt by Knodel et al to have a more rigorous definition over at the IETF: www.ietf.org/archive/id/d...
This might indeed be interesting to inform decisions about the frequency of commits. Our DS design is pretty set already, but it would be interesting to compare the details.
February 27, 2025 at 1:40 AM
This might indeed be interesting to inform decisions about the frequency of commits. Our DS design is pretty set already, but it would be interesting to compare the details.