New York Times, November 23, 1924: “The automobile looms up as a far more destructive piece of mechanism than the machine gun. The reckless motorist deals more death than the artilleryman. … Immediate action [is necessary] to halt the homicidal orgy of the automobile.”
New York Times, November 23, 1924: “The automobile looms up as a far more destructive piece of mechanism than the machine gun. The reckless motorist deals more death than the artilleryman. … Immediate action [is necessary] to halt the homicidal orgy of the automobile.”
4 hours of focused work.
Session 1: 30min with goal of check geo focus of filtout items.
4 hours of focused work.
Session 1: 30min with goal of check geo focus of filtout items.
By accepting cars on our streets, we implicitly accept tens of thousands of death per city per year.
By accepting cars on our streets, we implicitly accept tens of thousands of death per city per year.
When I ridicule car use, what I usually have in mind is what we are missing out on: the walkable cities with undeadly streets and pedestrian friendly atmosphere where one can walk without being paranoid and on high alert looking right and left.
When I ridicule car use, what I usually have in mind is what we are missing out on: the walkable cities with undeadly streets and pedestrian friendly atmosphere where one can walk without being paranoid and on high alert looking right and left.
- random reply
- suggesting car use is a bad option
- 100 comments of backlash within an hour (cultish)
- random reply
- suggesting car use is a bad option
- 100 comments of backlash within an hour (cultish)
the value to society is such a subjective thing. it's a function of the ideas and culture of that society, therefore:
being a successful entrepreneur is mostly about being good at predicting what a culture values
the value to society is such a subjective thing. it's a function of the ideas and culture of that society, therefore:
being a successful entrepreneur is mostly about being good at predicting what a culture values
The emotions part need not be analogous to human emotions. It is sufficient that LLMs have any objective function: the objective function of answering user questions can be considered an emotion.
So ChatGPT has some agency because it 'wants' and 'feels' rewarded by answering users
The emotions part need not be analogous to human emotions. It is sufficient that LLMs have any objective function: the objective function of answering user questions can be considered an emotion.
So ChatGPT has some agency because it 'wants' and 'feels' rewarded by answering users