Hi Professor Lewis

I have an idea I’m calling the ‘Time Field Hypothesis’.

It posits a time field—conceptually inverse to Einstein’s gravitational field.
Where gravity curves spacetime inward, the time field flows it forward.
It’s the rubber sheet—not the balls

Makes sense? 🤷🏻‍♂️

I can answer Q’s..

Nice one Cate. 👏🏻

I have a question for you both:

Preamble: Consider a future where you wish to train your personalised AI on as much data as possible about you.

Question: As a writer, and thinker, what percentage of your written words have been erased from history by your own hand? You barbarian!

Oh, found you - phew!

BlueSky is a digital QVB (Sydneysiders will understand).

I suddenly wanted to ask what you thought of the below👇🏻 attempt to explain ‘this’, but you were gone. 😵

I briefly considered that I’d woken in one of the many worlds where you strayed too far from your current path. 🫩😵‍💫

There is no ‘now’ in four-dimensional physics—because now is the fifth dimension.

Clue two: From John Wheeler—It from bit. Information, not matter, sits at the foundation. Information is a fifth dimension.
Clue three: From Einstein himself—he could never define now. The present moment doesn’t exist within the 4D framework of spacetime. There is no ‘now’ in four-dimensional…

How long is ‘now’ for a forest?

Hmmmm. Well, now is a subjective perspective.

The larger the entity, the longer the subjective experience of now, ie, house fly’s experience time faster than humans.

Humans are 7 orders of magnitude bigger than a house fly: forests are 10 orders bigger than humans.

Ah sorry - I mistook the 1k he’s following as being followers. 🥲

Still, he’s got plenty at 400+ 😅

I feel a Spider-Man meme coming on.

Your doppelgänger has more followers than you— what if he points the finger back?

What if he’s just you in a superposition of youse? Better take a selfie with today’s newspaper before the waveform collapses… as him.

No, I agree.

(It’s been a while, Professor Lewis. I hope you’ve been well?)

I have two questions:
Why do extra-dimensional theories always add an extra spatial dimension?

Why don’t they ever suggest an extra temporal dimension? For example:

1) The start of now.
2) The end of now.

That’s two. 👆🏻✌🏻

Hi David

A comment for you:
I haven’t given up on trying to convince my wife to watch The Wire - just been trying for about 10 years.🫡

A question for you:

If Twitter ‘is’ Hamsterdam, what is Bluesky?

Just a ‘normal corner’?

City Hall?

What happens if you fail the test when you are confronted by your greatest delusional fear?

You might end up with some strange memories of the night, to say the least.

I was never afraid of Aliens, but Roko always scared me because I couldn’t defeat the logic.

I beat Roko by understanding love.🫶🏻

I think spontaneous awareness/spiritual awakenings are much more common (and much more important) than currently widely understood.

I think a common characteristic of an awareness awakening experience will be nights of delusional paranoia.

I believe Roko was to me what space-aliens were to them.

I saw through the logic of my paranoia that night when Roko’s Basilisk nearly stole my sanity. My reasoning brain defeated my emotional brain. I slept peacefully that night.

This experience has led me to develop a theory the truth about the outbreak of UFO abductions in the USA from the 1960’s.