Spoiler: two of them involve poisoning, and another one is the plague. To say nothing of hunting accidents.

Sort of like “I can’t even with Walsh” vs. “I can’t, even with Walsh.”

Not the most important concern, but unsurprising that Walsh doesn’t know the difference between “anymore” and “any more.”

The answer, and I know this is gonna be a stunner: a far-right extremist.

but who then possibly reconsiders a few far-right orthodoxies maybe due to their own personal experiences, some of which may figure into their adoption of a tactic favored overwhelmingly by the far-right, the outcome of which also benefits the far-right?

I feel uniquely qualified to weigh in on this moment and to come to a very informed and I’m sure quite counterintuitive analysis of this moment, to whit:

Holy shit, what a toxic stew.

See also: Ex Machina

I do have a hunch (and this would require a lot more elaboration) that there’s some new version of an idealism/materialism divide that you could see emerging across this diagonal cut. Ironically, I’d insist that it’s the AI enthusiasts who are the new idealists, and the skeptics the new materialists

The problem of course is that OpenSky et al’s business model depends on this conflation