To be fair, they probably have less sugar than most yogurts

Seems especially problematic in 2 party consent states like CA?

Stanford is on there. I even managed a rejection through the system :)

rosenblatt: rogers was in some ways a response to debbie does dallas, where nfu's "need to use" standard didn't save the use in an expressive work

so eliminating rogers sends us back to debbie does dallas-land (poor debbie)

need ability to 12(b)(16) these questions

maybe we're ok b/c nominative fair use can do a lot of work

many of the rogers cases could have been decided on nominative fair use

(but what about empire? honey badger? sylvanian drama?)

also: what nfu has that rogers doesn't is requirement that you don't use more than necessary

victoria schwartz: rethinking use of trademarks in art

what do we do with the concurrence in jack daniel's that says "what if rogers isn't even good law at all"? if we lose rogers, what do we have?

#ipsc2025