Phil Slarks
banner
philslarks.bsky.social
Phil Slarks
@philslarks.bsky.social
Civil servant, Boro fan - Mid Sussex. Interested in competition, digital markets, growth and productivity policy and grunge.
Birdsong. Deafening, not drowned out by engine noise. Wonderful.
November 30, 2025 at 1:16 AM
It’s definitely not just about income/wealth. It has a strong cultural dimension. A middle class person is probably a graduate, perhaps a professional or a manager, shops at Waitrose, reads a broadsheet newspaper, might be on Bluesky! A working class tradesperson might earn double their salary.
November 10, 2025 at 11:16 PM
I liked him but cheerio Rob, hope you get relegated with Wolves. Mowbray for a period to stabilise things would be my best best, or Brendan Rogers. Please god not Russell Martin or Steven Gerrard
November 7, 2025 at 4:58 PM
It was a thing when I was a kid 30 years ago, but much rarer than now. I don’t think anyone in my class of 42 kids (the 90s!) did it, whereas most of my kids’ classes are.
October 31, 2025 at 10:58 AM
I’m really sorry. That’s truly dreadful.
October 24, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Where is this please?
October 19, 2025 at 1:41 PM
That and the really poor quality of the forward passes by the boro midfield
September 30, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Reposted by Phil Slarks
Top sociological fact: the biggest predictor of a couple having three kids is if the first two are the same gender
September 2, 2025 at 3:12 PM
You can check the sources on eg Our World in Data if you’re unsure but ‘the super rich’ are sufficiently few in number I doubt they move the aggregate stats much. Housing wealth will be included. At some point though you have to accept the evidence you’re looking at
August 30, 2025 at 11:29 AM
The graph they show in the thread shows that UK wealth inequality is average by international standards.
August 30, 2025 at 7:47 AM
I agree that the nastiness is what makes it work. I think David Walliams has tried a similar trick recently (with commercial success, as far as I can tell). They’re definitely nasty, but in general I’m not at all a fan.
August 11, 2025 at 9:07 PM
They’re obviously dated in places (and some of them do have big chunks that don’t work - eg James and the Giant Peach drags horribly towards the end). But I honestly think he’s second to none in how he writes for children. The language is just so alive for them in a way v few others manage.
August 11, 2025 at 9:04 PM
‘If it could be done someone else would already have done it’ is both a bad attitude to have in government and very often true
August 4, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Interesting (and gloomy!) thanks. Is this all downstream of 20 years of rubbish economic growth?
July 23, 2025 at 6:00 AM
Agree. A world in which the average person experiences the loss of (possibly multiple) children is so much worse than today it’s hard to imagine
July 22, 2025 at 12:25 PM
Was very quiet at the start of last season but traffic gradually picked up and is ok now
July 19, 2025 at 12:28 PM
It’s very much not a plot driven thing. The vibe of it is completely unique and bewitching. But no pressure if you don’t think you’d fancy it! Life is short.
July 14, 2025 at 11:42 AM
There’s so much I don’t understand. Not the most important bit but…Neil Hamilton?!
July 11, 2025 at 9:17 PM
Reposted by Phil Slarks
‘Cringe’, like ‘problematic’, is increasingly commonly used to denote ‘I think you should be embarrassed about your preference/opinion and want to slap you down accordingly, but am wholly unwilling to explain, let alone defend, my dismissiveness.’
June 14, 2025 at 9:41 PM