Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
openclimatedata.net
Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
@openclimatedata.net
Well... if anyone knows anything, please post! #COP30
November 11, 2025 at 6:03 PM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
"the strategic partnership between Microsoft, the UNFCCC secretariat, NEDAMCO Africa and EY which aims to modernize how climate data is managed, reviewed, analyzed, and shared"
November 11, 2025 at 8:37 AM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
12 Nov | #IPCC at #COP30
12.15pm UTC-3 AR7 WGI Interactive Atlas building on AR6

In the last IPCC cycle, Working Group I included for the first time an interactive atlas, this session looks at how WGI will build on this for the Seventh Assessment Report.

Follow live👇
➡️ scienceforclimateaction.org
November 11, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
I've made a spreadsheet with the event schedules for COP30 pavilions, including the UK 🇬🇧 Japan 🇯🇵 Indonesia 🇮🇩 Australia 🇦🇺 and China 🇨🇳

The UNFCCC has a schedule list, but hardly any of the major pavilions are on there.

I'll update the list as I collect more ⬇️

docs.google.com/spreadsheets...
COP 30 pavilions
docs.google.com
November 11, 2025 at 12:45 AM
"the strategic partnership between Microsoft, the UNFCCC secretariat, NEDAMCO Africa and EY which aims to modernize how climate data is managed, reviewed, analyzed, and shared"
November 11, 2025 at 8:37 AM
Later today ...

"A New Era for Climate Analytics: Launching the Climate Data Hub"

#COP30

www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyuB...
A New Era for Climate Analytics: Launching the Climate Data Hub
YouTube video by UN Climate Change - Events
www.youtube.com
November 11, 2025 at 8:33 AM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
📣 We just released a new free resource at @climatecentral.org - a 72-slide deck introducing key facts about climate change, including its causes, impacts, and solutions. It also comes with speaker notes and links for local storytelling.

➡️ www.climatecentral.org/climate-matt... (English & Spanish)
November 10, 2025 at 12:52 PM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
Oops. Ooooooooooooops.

I do hope that nobody has been given or denied a job/promotion based on their SpringerNature citation counts in the past 15 years.

arxiv.org/pdf/2511.01675

h/t @nathlarigaldie.bsky.social
November 7, 2025 at 2:02 PM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
This (not from that piece) is one of those charts where I am completely aware of the data but my mental map of how the global economy works still almost refuses to update to the new reality. Because the pace of change has been so rapid.
November 10, 2025 at 7:57 AM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
"Here is the graph, which is so wild, the climate scientist had to call a colleague & check it"

It is true actually! In the Global Carbon Budget we do not usually show the LUC like this, because of interannual variability & uncertainty. But it is what the data says!

politiken.dk/klima/art106...
November 6, 2025 at 7:40 AM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
Publishing to arXiv, Zenodo, or similar with a Creative Commons license is insurance (and wholesome). Either the whole document or a report that at least contains relevant figures, etc. If forced to later sign a copyright assignment/exclusive license (can fight), the CC license remains irrevocable.
November 4, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
What´s more, the updated NDC of the EU and its Member States is already published: www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/pre...
November 5, 2025 at 2:03 PM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
UPDATED: Yesterday, China released its full 2035 climate pledge, building on Xi's UN speech. Our updated @carbonbrief.org analysis dives into the details, inc:

🌎 What the NDC says about the US
🗞️ Reactions to the targets
⚡ China's 2035 plans for coal

Find out more ⬇️
Q&A: What does China’s new Paris Agreement pledge mean for climate action? - Carbon Brief
President Xi Jinping has pledged to cut China’s greenhouse gas emissions to 7-10% below peak levels by 2035, while “striving to do better”.
www.carbonbrief.org
November 4, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
At #Ozone #MOP37 in Nairobi, participants noted that 169 parties have now ratified the Kigali Amendment, which is 9 more than a year ago, and 29 short of universal ratification achieved for the other amendments to the #MontrealProtocol. @unepozone.bsky.social
November 4, 2025 at 4:03 PM
"However, methodological updates account for 0.1°C of the improvement, and the upcoming withdrawal of the US from the Paris Agreement will cancel another 0.1°C, meaning that the new NDCs themselves have barely moved the needle."

www.pbl.nl/en/publicati...
Something that's worth flagging about this report is the subtle pivot from "current policy" being the worst-case scenario to including discussions of backsliding. Most calculations presented include the USA meeting its new-but-Biden-era NDC commitments, which will formally elapse in Jan.
NEW: The latest climate pledges under the Paris Agreement have driven only a slight fall in predicted global temperature rise over the course of this century.

The UN Emissions Gap Report finds that implementing current policies would lead to up to 2.8°C of warming, down from 3.1°C. 🧵
November 4, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
New national climate plans have barely moved the needle on limiting global warming. Yet there is hope.

According to UNEP's latest #EmissionsGap Report, accelerated adoption of renewable energy and falling costs mean we have the tools to cut emissions now: www.unep.org/news-and-sto...
November 4, 2025 at 2:08 PM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
At a workshop today discussing improving historical weather & climate reconstructions for the British & Irish Isles.

Key questions: if you had a high resolution reanalysis for these islands, what would you want to use it for? What complementary observational datasets should be prioritised?
November 4, 2025 at 9:16 AM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
“Aviation greenhouse gas emissions amount to around 10% of Ireland’s total and have increased 500% since 1990, while the population grew just 44%.”

www.irishtimes.com/opinion/2025...
The Debate: Should we introduce an air-travel tax to aid climate efforts?
Is a levy on the aviation industry a necessary corrective or just another tax on consumers? An environmental campaigner debates Conor Pope
www.irishtimes.com
November 4, 2025 at 6:35 AM
"Towards an open model intercomparison platform for integrated assessment models scenarios" - first step maybe not "This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution"?
There is a new Perspective which comes to much the same conclusions on future databases, thankfully they did manage to mention earlier work in passing...

(ref 28 is the article in the first post, ref 29 is another in the same journal special collection).
www.nature.com/articles/s41...

3/
November 4, 2025 at 8:29 AM
"Free daytime power for families across Australia is proof that what's good for the planet is good for your pocket"

www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11...
Australian households to get free electricity three hours a day
Saying there is enough solar power for everyone in the daytime, the federal government will direct retailers to provide three hours of free power every day to consumers.
www.abc.net.au
November 3, 2025 at 9:26 PM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
Delegates at #MontrealProtocol #MOP37 did not waste any time getting to work Monday on some of the big-ticket items including the next replenishment of the Multilateral Fund and stubbornly high emissions of hydrofluorocarbon (HFC)-23

Read ➡️ enb.iisd.org/montreal-pro...

@unepozone.bsky.social
November 3, 2025 at 8:53 PM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
The @economist.com invited my to write about the climate backlash. I argue that rolling back climate policies is economic suicide masquerading as pragmatism. Sugar-coated - amongst others - by commentators who pretend to explain the vibe shift - but in fact justify it. They should grow a spine.
November 3, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Reposted by Robert Gieseke (Openclimatedata)
Rogue Scholar is becoming a German Non-Profit Organization
The science blog archive Rogue Scholar started the process of becoming a German non-profit organization in 2026. This blog post summarizes the reasoning and the main steps needed to achieve this. Two weeks ago, I published a self-assessment of how Rogue Scholar adheres to the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI). Major gaps were identified in the areas of _governance_ and _sustainability_. To address these gaps, a major step forward would be to start a non-profit membership organization. The need to take this step at some point was obvious to me since I launched Rogue Scholar in April 2023. With the basic service operating and on a good path forward with 50,000 science blog posts archived by the end of the year, the time has arrived to make this step. Starting a non-profit membership organization in Germany means starting a _Verein_ , or registered association. The steps involved to formally register the association are clearly laid out and mainly involve the following: * at least seven founding members, * drafting statutes (_Satzung_), * founding general assembly with members approving statutes and electing a founding board, * registration at a local court, * registration for charitable status with the tax authorities. It helps that I have worked for non-profit organizations most of my professional life. Not only public universities, but also a non-profit publisher (PLOS), and two membership organizations (ORCID and DataCite), with the latter also being a German Verein. Interestingly, Research Organization Registry (ROR), an initiative that I helped launch in early 2019, is not a membership organization. Running a non-profit organization in Germany requires more paperwork compared to, for example, Belgium or the Netherlands, mainly to obtain and keep charitable status. This means a good amount of work for the founding board, especially the president and treasurer. One important question is the rights and responsibilities of members. As individuals or groups of people, rather than formal organizations, run many science blogs, membership has to be open to all legal entities, individuals and organizations. Membership fees should differentiate between individuals and organizations, and include at least two tiers for small and large organizations, for example: * individual 25 EUR/year * small organization 250 EUR/year * supporting organization 2500 EUR/year Rogue Scholar is a Diamond Open Access infrastructure with no fees to readers or authors. This means that membership can't be a requirement for a science blog to be archived in Rogue Scholar, but rather that membership comes with other benefits. Members not only help support a unique open scholarly infrastructure but also have a say in the governance of the organization via the general assembly, participation in the board, and potentially working groups going forward. For Rogue Scholar to achieve sustainability, membership fees are an important element. Two other aspects are also important: * **Volunteer labor** , particularly in the areas of outreach, support, and software development, becomes easier once Rogue Scholar has formal members * **Grant funding** , which becomes easier once Rogue Scholar obtains charitable status Please use Slack, email, Mastodon, or Bluesky if you have any questions or comments regarding Rogue Scholar becoming a non-profit membership organization. Rogue Scholar is a scholarly infrastructure that is free for all authors and readers. You can support Rogue Scholar with a one-time or recurring donation, by becoming a sponsor, or soon by becoming a member. ## References 1. Fenner, M. (2025, October 20). Rogue Scholar follows the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI). _Front Matter_. https://doi.org/10.53731/m65a8-6sm21 2. POSI Adopters. (2025). _The Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure v2.0_. https://doi.org/10.14454/G8WV-VM65 3. Fenner, M. (2023, April 4). The Rogue Scholar is now open for business. _Front Matter_. https://doi.org/10.53731/z9v2s-bh329 4. California Digital Library, DataCite, Crossref, & Digital Science (United Kingdom). (2018). _The ROR of the crowd: Get involved!_. https://doi.org/10.71938/SNA1-ZC49
blog.front-matter.io
November 3, 2025 at 11:35 AM
目标类型及描述。争取到 2035 年温室气体排放水平稳
中有降,比 2030 年下降 5%以上。

"Target type and description: Strive to achieve a stable to slightly reduced level of greenhouse gas emissions by 2035, with a decrease of more than 5% compared to 2030."

(Google Translated.)
November 3, 2025 at 11:57 AM
🇨🇳 China's NDC is out.

unfccc.int/sites/defaul...
unfccc.int
November 3, 2025 at 11:53 AM