You aren’t even reading your own source right , and btw they didn’t not provide their sources so there’s no way you could have possibly done due diligence and fact checked them.
October 8, 2025 at 11:53 PM
You aren’t even reading your own source right , and btw they didn’t not provide their sources so there’s no way you could have possibly done due diligence and fact checked them.
I didn’t say he was a distraction in favor of Trump. I think it makes people complacent, that this one person will save them and the local level work starts slipping through the cracks
August 22, 2025 at 2:40 PM
I didn’t say he was a distraction in favor of Trump. I think it makes people complacent, that this one person will save them and the local level work starts slipping through the cracks
Here’s another data point that would be helpful. Unfortunately, they don’t break liberal down further to identify how many are actually leftist so it will the skew the math but if we’re both willing to acknowledge and keep that in mind we can make it work
April 20, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Here’s another data point that would be helpful. Unfortunately, they don’t break liberal down further to identify how many are actually leftist so it will the skew the math but if we’re both willing to acknowledge and keep that in mind we can make it work
And again we have other numbers confirming, and independents do include progressive voters who don’t affiliate with democrats. Was the six percent switch of republicans worth alienating the 16% of Biden voters and leaving non-voters at home? And again doing that while knowing you’re going to lose
April 19, 2025 at 5:41 PM
And again we have other numbers confirming, and independents do include progressive voters who don’t affiliate with democrats. Was the six percent switch of republicans worth alienating the 16% of Biden voters and leaving non-voters at home? And again doing that while knowing you’re going to lose
Hillel is not entitled to an audience or to be agreed with. I feel you are arguing HOW the demands were stated rather than their intention, much like what happened with defund the police. Here is ucscsjp confirming
May 6, 2024 at 4:09 PM
Hillel is not entitled to an audience or to be agreed with. I feel you are arguing HOW the demands were stated rather than their intention, much like what happened with defund the police. Here is ucscsjp confirming
Not ignoring it, it wasn’t the question we were discussing. Stefanik was still asking that question which was about Gay’s thoughts not the university policy
January 7, 2024 at 7:10 PM
Not ignoring it, it wasn’t the question we were discussing. Stefanik was still asking that question which was about Gay’s thoughts not the university policy
You are ignoring the context, that was a question from Stefanik who is known to support antisemitic ideologies. It wasn’t a good faith question, so she responded with an explanation of the policy. It wasn’t a question that could be answered with a simple yes/no
January 7, 2024 at 6:46 PM
You are ignoring the context, that was a question from Stefanik who is known to support antisemitic ideologies. It wasn’t a good faith question, so she responded with an explanation of the policy. It wasn’t a question that could be answered with a simple yes/no