why is the president the only person testing the limits of his power? everyone should see what they can get away with. what if zookeepers gave helicopters to gorillas? nobody has tried this

GOAT

leaking my deepest darkest secret ... i find women super hot

Ah sure we can be a little silly

"trans women think girl is when skirt" is cis people talking to cis people about the scary tranny they are unable to understand because their minds are trapped by the regime of heterosexuality. every tgirl i know has had to speedrun through sociology, history, and feminist theory to justify herself

you got games on your phone?

This is what you get for talking about being sexually harassed and physically grabbed by men in a bar.

Truly, the cutting edge of feminism.

If this spending bill passes the Senate and is signed into law in its current form, all but the most financially fortunate transgender people will be forcibly detransitioned regardless of their ability - or inability - to produce their own sex hormones.

This is a ten thousand-alarm fire.

one of the most insane normalized aspects of our political climate is politicians going after their own constituents in the name of anti-wokeness. what are we doing here

by what means is a human being measured and further for what purpose? sex instrumentalizes. the woman-ized body becomes viewed strictly through the lens of its worth as a technology under the control of the family or the capitalist state. the patriarch or the old boys network.

just as there is no "standard male or standard female", there is no "standard human". a just world becomes accomodating for all forms humans take - physically, psychologically, linguistically, culturally ... we must ask, where a "standard" exists, who determines this?

their counterargument is "i love enforcing heterosexuality as a regime because it is natural to me that women and trans people shut up and maintain the social formation"

the obvious alternative to cleaving humankind into two sexes is to allow the body to exist in a continuity and multiplicity of forms, unifying the individual particular w/ the universal, something that also is closely knit to disability justice & anti racism. what is their counter argument?

i think butler is better approached as a feminist scholar of sex itself rather than being typecasted by a cis public as a scholar of transness. the former necessarily and inevitably interfaces with the latter, but the reason the latter happens is bc of the naturalization of cisness

they should invent a lesbian who has bunny ears that are floppy lop ears 95% of the time but the ears suddenly rise up when theyre really excited to talk about something

office women yuri

When you find a new song to obsess over and listen to exclusively for the next 10 days