Olivier Bakker
@obbakker.bsky.social
Staff Scientist in the Tyrnka group at the Wellcome Sanger Institute. Interested in all things functional genomics and high content imaging.
Reposted by Olivier Bakker
"The main question when reviewing a paper should be whether its conclusions are likely to be correct, not whether it would be important if it were true. Real advances are built with bricks, not straw."
A perpetual must-read: www.nature.com/articles/545...
A perpetual must-read: www.nature.com/articles/545...
January 18, 2025 at 12:58 AM
"The main question when reviewing a paper should be whether its conclusions are likely to be correct, not whether it would be important if it were true. Real advances are built with bricks, not straw."
A perpetual must-read: www.nature.com/articles/545...
A perpetual must-read: www.nature.com/articles/545...