Not Donald
not-donald.bsky.social
Not Donald
@not-donald.bsky.social
Professional writer, Ph.D., psychologist, author of 75+ books, Mensa dropout, and proud member of Project Steve. Not a Trump fanboy. (Note: Profile pic was taken when I was 20, but I’m NOT 20 now.)
Pinned
The same could be said about virtually every Trump appointee, as well as about Trump himself. Being even remotely qualified for their positions wasn’t a requirement.

Looking good on TV or buying their way in, and swearing fealty to Trump were the major—or only—qualifiers.
Trump is insisting that every Afghan admitted to the United States under the Biden administration must now be re-examined after this single shooting.

Can we assume then that he’ll order an investigation of every member of a Nazi, white nationalist, or MAGA right-wing hate group, too?
November 27, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Reposted by Not Donald
Happy Thanksgiving dear Luna
Now THIS is funny
November 27, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Reposted by Not Donald
Here's your fucking engagement. Bot farms in russia and elsewhere.
November 23, 2025 at 7:34 PM
Reposted by Not Donald
“..,attack President Trump?” He’s a known sexual predator and an adjudicated rapist. If ALL the Epstein info is released—including the material that 1000 FBI agents flagged for mentioning Trump—we’ll likely learn he’s also a molester and rapist of little girls.

It’s “confirmation,” not “attack.”
November 18, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Look at Trump in this recent photo. Then try standing at the same angle for 30 seconds and see what happens,

What prevents him from toppling over when wearing those lifts? Are his knees on backwards, or is his enormous ass acting as a counterweight to his (slightly less?) enormous gut?
November 6, 2025 at 8:09 AM
Trump “truthed” something? No, he posted a message on his right-wing social media platform.

Is THAT why he named it Truth Social… so with every post he could claim to be telling the truth? That’s pretty ironic given that Trump is the most notorious habitual liar of the 21st century.
October 24, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Trump pardons yet another correctly convicted criminal. And—big surprise—it’s someone whose company is a Trump business partner and helped his crypto venture be extremely profitable.
October 23, 2025 at 6:44 PM
While looking for irregularities, he should check out Trump’s trades. He’s deliberately moving the entire market and is an active trader. See his recent threat to China of 100% tariff bump, for example

SEC Chair Atkins says regulators looking for 'hanky-panky in markets www.cnbc.com/2025/10/22/s...
SEC Chair Atkins says regulators looking for 'hanky-panky' in markets, even with ongoing shutdown
Like most other federal agencies, the SEC is largely sidelined during the Capitol Hill impasse.
www.cnbc.com
October 22, 2025 at 9:03 PM
“The radical left”: those who believe we should have affordable healthcare and a solid education; millionaires and billionaires should pay their share of taxes; and an aspiring dictator, a corrupt, enabling SCOTUS, and congressional Republicans who look the other way aren’t “just fine.”
October 21, 2025 at 11:08 PM
Reposted by Not Donald
“Why can’t they let me compete the transfer of all the wealth in our country to the already obscenely rich; eliminate all the non-whites, gays, and Jews; replace the Constitution with the Bible; and provide cover for a president who rapes little girls without making such a fuss?”
October 16, 2025 at 2:59 PM
Reposted by Not Donald
Virtually NOTHING about Santos’ background was real. His entire campaign was a fraud. He committed wire fraud and identify theft, and he spent campaign donations on himself. He was so corrupt that even House Republicans turned on him and voted to remove him. Like Trump, he deserved a prison sentence
October 18, 2025 at 12:39 AM
***TRUMP FOR PRISON 2025***

Trump justifies many of his most egregious violations of the Constitution and our laws with “it’s a national emergency!” The SCOTUS response is invariably: “Sounds reasonable to us,” offering yet additional cover for his lawlessness.

Trump IS the national emergency.
October 16, 2025 at 6:05 AM
Reposted by Not Donald
Attempting to prosecute a blatant criminal for his crimes is not an illegal act. That’s what impeachments are for. And if not for SCOTUS’ ridiculous declaration that anything he does in office as part of his duties can’t be criminally charged, he’d be facing indictments when he leaves office.
October 12, 2025 at 3:47 PM
Reposted by Not Donald
No one is funding the protests. Protesters aren’t paid. The protests aren’t Trump rallies. Only right-wing morons like Sean Duffy assume that people would only show up if a paycheck were involved. Just like during Vietnam, being united in a cause (ending the Trump regime’s lunacy) is the motivation.
October 13, 2025 at 3:56 PM
The U.S. has stepped in to help Argentina. Here's what it means www.cnbc.com/2025/10/13/t...

Why was it done? Because Trump loves dictatorships: both current and potential.
October 13, 2025 at 6:26 PM
Trump administration begins layoffs of federal workers amid government shutdown and yet claims the following:

Hassett said that “any government worker who loses their job” will have Democrats to blame for their layoff.

www.cnbc.com/2025/10/10/t...
Trump administration begins layoffs of federal workers amid government shutdown
The Trump administration and Republicans have sought to blame Democrats for the government shutdown, and any negative fallout from it.
www.cnbc.com
October 10, 2025 at 9:05 PM
If Trump plans to go after everyone who attempted to indict, prosecute, or sue him for his criminal activities, the courts will be tied up for decades.
October 9, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Reposted by Not Donald
Transgender windmills on every corner
Trump: "If we didn't win this election. If we had these people that were running that were ruining our country, destroying our country with their open borders and men playing in women's sports and transgender from everybody and windmills all over the place ... I'm not sure we'd even have a country."
October 7, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Reposted by Not Donald
3/ “In firing the TJAGs, Hegseth did not point to any misconduct to justify his decision. His only stated reasons were that he considered the TJAGs not ‘well-suited’ for the job, and he wanted to avoid ‘roadblocks to orders that are given by a commander in chief.’”
October 7, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Reposted by Not Donald
MSNBC cuts off Josh Hawley to fact-check rant about phone tapping
www.rawstory.com
MSNBC cuts off Josh Hawley to fact-check rant about phone tapping
twp.ai
October 7, 2025 at 4:42 PM
Reposted by Not Donald
It’s just that Trump knows so many Ghislaines.
October 7, 2025 at 1:51 AM
Reposted by Not Donald
I’m waiting for the NG and other senior military leaders to say no to these orders.
October 6, 2025 at 1:39 AM
Reposted by Not Donald
Does Stephen Miller call it terrorism when Starbucks messes up his order too?
October 5, 2025 at 3:04 AM