Nicole Donawho
banner
nicoledonawho.bsky.social
Nicole Donawho
@nicoledonawho.bsky.social
Historian. #trekkie. 🐶❤️ Leroy & Moose. Posts do not represent my employer.
So many thanks to @phdrachel.bsky.social for taking care of our doggos and bringing me new clothes while I was in the hospital this weekend ❤️ Discharged this afternoon and heading home!
November 23, 2025 at 8:01 PM
Hit one of my 2025 Bingo items!
November 12, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Got a hat for that
November 5, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Never been to Congo, but the Kenyan hills were absolutely stunning when we were there #hatm
November 3, 2025 at 1:09 AM
@phdrachel.bsky.social it’s not just you. A screenshot from 12 years ago between me and the husband. Maybe 6months into dating? #hatm
October 27, 2025 at 1:10 AM
Introducing our newest short-term foster, Piper. 🥰🐶
October 19, 2025 at 8:07 PM
Y’all - I am begging you to stop reposting this kind of obvious rage bait that makes you look like my mother on Facebook.

If it doesn’t have a citation, find one. If there isn’t one, block it or call it out.
October 13, 2025 at 2:55 AM
I know it's easy to get headline fatigue, so I wanted to give us all a little bit of context about where we are.

I pulled headlines from Bush Jr. and Obama's second terms for roughly the same week in October that we just had and placed them next to ours.
October 11, 2025 at 7:57 PM
Woman, I need you to be just so serious for once like omg
October 10, 2025 at 1:55 AM
“foundational American principles (eg. support for law enforcement…)”
October 4, 2025 at 11:38 PM
Time to go back to basics
September 30, 2025 at 11:31 PM
Also having my favorite cookies for dessert because I found them at Costco for a STEAL #hatm
September 28, 2025 at 11:53 PM
I really need someone to write a book on evangelical material culture.
September 28, 2025 at 12:13 PM
I am DYING at Trump trying to say acetaminophen 🤣
September 22, 2025 at 10:44 PM
6b:
Or even the conclusion, which clearly states "Our model is far too simple to allow for policy evaluations of alternatives to our current system of high-skill immigration."
September 20, 2025 at 9:55 PM
6a:
If the WH had bothered to read past the first page of the 2017 article (Understanding the Economic Impact of the H-1B Program on the U.S.), they would have read this:
September 20, 2025 at 9:55 PM
#6:
Their quote is from the abstract. It also leaves out "On the other hand, complements in production benefited substantially from immigration, and immigration also lowered prices and raised the output of IT goods by between 1.9% and 2.5%, thus benefiting consumers."
September 20, 2025 at 9:55 PM
#5:
I'm not sure why they're being shy about the companies like this was not insanely public. Unless there are other companies running around doing the exact same thing, these are: Microsoft, Intel, Amazon, and (most likely) Salesforce (but could be Blue Origin).
September 20, 2025 at 9:27 PM
4a:
On its face though - we need to seriously criticize the claim that unemployment for *essentially* the same group of people is simultaneously at 6.1 to 7.5% and 3.02%.
September 20, 2025 at 9:00 PM
#4:
Shockingly, we know where the information in this claim comes from. A post from the Economic Innovation Group suggests that the data within the Federal Reserve Bank of NY's study could use some additional context:
agglomerations.substack.com/p/a-viral-ch...
September 20, 2025 at 9:00 PM
3a:
The American Immigration Council has a chart that can assist us here.

EPI's main argument is that employers are choosing Level 2 to undercut wages on H-1B jobs. However, the biggest jump between L2 and L3 is management. If the job doesn't supervise others, they are limited in moving beyond L2.
September 20, 2025 at 8:50 PM
#3: takes us to the Economic Policy Institute (linked below), where the argument is that the DOL is purposefully allowing employers to undercut the market wage using wage levels.
www.epi.org/publication/...

That's not how wage levels work.
September 20, 2025 at 8:50 PM
#2:
This information comes from the annual Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Workers reports (available from USCIS). In the FY04 report, we see the 32% number in the WH proclamation. If they'd read past the first page, they'd have found that the number for computer-related occupations was over 38%.
September 20, 2025 at 8:46 PM
1d -
September 20, 2025 at 8:21 PM
1c -
September 20, 2025 at 8:21 PM