Natasha Kaminsky
@natashakaminsky.bsky.social
Reposted by Natasha Kaminsky
Sadly, people have been lied to by omission by our govts and public health and they don’t know that no one fully recovers from Covid.
“There is no such thing as a COVID infection without consequence.”
— David Putrino, Long Covid researcher
www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks...
“There is no such thing as a COVID infection without consequence.”
— David Putrino, Long Covid researcher
www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks...
Beyond long COVID — how reinfections could be causing silent long-term organ damage | CBC Radio
Scientific evidence is painting an unsettling picture: COVID infections, even if mild or asymptomatic, may be causing long-term cellular and organ damage, as well as increasing your risk of developing...
www.cbc.ca
November 29, 2025 at 1:52 AM
Sadly, people have been lied to by omission by our govts and public health and they don’t know that no one fully recovers from Covid.
“There is no such thing as a COVID infection without consequence.”
— David Putrino, Long Covid researcher
www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks...
“There is no such thing as a COVID infection without consequence.”
— David Putrino, Long Covid researcher
www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks...
Reposted by Natasha Kaminsky
About 2.5% of people in Canada are infected and/or experiencing life activity-limiting long COVID this week.
The estimated cost of hospitalizations from this week's infections in Canada is $92.7M.
The estimated cost of hospitalizations from this week's infections in Canada is $92.7M.
November 25, 2025 at 2:22 AM
About 2.5% of people in Canada are infected and/or experiencing life activity-limiting long COVID this week.
The estimated cost of hospitalizations from this week's infections in Canada is $92.7M.
The estimated cost of hospitalizations from this week's infections in Canada is $92.7M.
Reposted by Natasha Kaminsky
The danger of an amorphous definition is that it gives any political actor the power to redefine a “threat” whenever it’s convenient. A label that isn’t anchored in evidence isn’t really a label at all; it’s a political weapon, one that can be aimed wherever those in power choose.
November 20, 2025 at 1:42 PM
The danger of an amorphous definition is that it gives any political actor the power to redefine a “threat” whenever it’s convenient. A label that isn’t anchored in evidence isn’t really a label at all; it’s a political weapon, one that can be aimed wherever those in power choose.
Reposted by Natasha Kaminsky
What is there to stop this government or a future government from calling critics, protesters, or totally unrelated groups “Antifa” simply because the label is useful to them? This is a recipe for old-fashioned repression under the colour of law.
November 20, 2025 at 1:42 PM
What is there to stop this government or a future government from calling critics, protesters, or totally unrelated groups “Antifa” simply because the label is useful to them? This is a recipe for old-fashioned repression under the colour of law.