They tell themselves that it’s not their job to make themselves the story. But it’s Trump who’s making them the story.

Not “killed.” Murdered

Typically Trump, Miller and Ratcliffe are just covering their own asses. www.reuters.com/world/us/off...

Thanksgiving in Mauritania a few years later, I gathered with eight or nine PCVs and a pair of embassy folks in search of adventure. We roasted a pea hen, and a baker on the team made pie. We drank ourselves stupid on smuggled Senegalese gin, and the embassy folks dropped $50 to make it happen.

What do you mean “if”?

It obviously has changed since there are presumably enlisted men who have been ordered to carry out murders on the high seas in the Caribbean and elsewhere. Those orders had to have come from the officers above them.

It pays to be a winner. Trump likes to attach himself in order to gain reflected glory.

My.Brain.Is.Mush.

Projection

I’d love to buy a Polestar 2 but unfortunately they aren’t selling them in the US anymore. They might sell more cars if it wasn’t so hard to buy one of them. Instead it’s gong to be a BMW

You're so naive. When did the "law" stop Trump from doing something?

Start with Melania.

He vowed to protect the unborn. Once they’re born, they’re on their own.

Stop calling it an “illegal war.” That legitimizes it. There’s a gray area between legality and illegality when it comes to war that’s the subject of legitimate debate. They’re extrajudicial executions. AKA murder. Same thing Duarte did.

He's not very good at political punditry. He ought to stick to data analysis which is what he actually is good at.

The New York Times article makes it sound like the fact the Sup Ct is taking this case is a bad thing for voting rights, when it's the exact opposite.