Mihail Velikov
@mvelikov.bsky.social
Agree completely! One point was to show how close you get with simple prompts. We are working on quantifying and fixing the hallucinations though that will take more work. But even with the current state of agentic AI a lot of the remaining issues I think are fixable, let alone with what comes next.
December 19, 2024 at 6:55 AM
Agree completely! One point was to show how close you get with simple prompts. We are working on quantifying and fixing the hallucinations though that will take more work. But even with the current state of agentic AI a lot of the remaining issues I think are fixable, let alone with what comes next.
Thank you, @amanela.bsky.social! We did consider that, but decided against it due to the ethical considerations and the strain it would have brought on editors and referees. I'm pretty sure they could be published somewhere. I was super curious though how high up the ladder they would have made it.
December 19, 2024 at 6:08 AM
Thank you, @amanela.bsky.social! We did consider that, but decided against it due to the ethical considerations and the strain it would have brought on editors and referees. I'm pretty sure they could be published somewhere. I was super curious though how high up the ladder they would have made it.
Thanks for featuring our work, Ethan!
December 18, 2024 at 4:23 PM
Thanks for featuring our work, Ethan!
In the paper we raise further questions about research integrity and evaluation that reflect the realities of AI-enabled research production and give some initial thoughts on ways to address those.
December 17, 2024 at 3:02 AM
In the paper we raise further questions about research integrity and evaluation that reflect the realities of AI-enabled research production and give some initial thoughts on ways to address those.
Key implication: When AI can rapidly produce plausible hypotheses for any empirical finding at unprecedented scale, how do we ensure quality control in academic research?
December 17, 2024 at 3:02 AM
Key implication: When AI can rapidly produce plausible hypotheses for any empirical finding at unprecedented scale, how do we ensure quality control in academic research?
Another version for the OLM signal invokes production-based asset pricing arguments and cites Cochrane (1992) and Zhang (2005). While the stories are not always flawless, they are remarkably coherent, especially considering the scale at which we can produce them.
github.com
December 17, 2024 at 3:02 AM
Another version for the OLM signal invokes production-based asset pricing arguments and cites Cochrane (1992) and Zhang (2005). While the stories are not always flawless, they are remarkably coherent, especially considering the scale at which we can produce them.
For example, one of the signals is the ratio of current assets to EBITDA. The LLM creatively names the signal "Operating Liquidity Margin". One version hypothesizes that OLM predicts returns due to slow diffusion of information and cites Hirshleifer and Teoh's (2003) limited attention model.
github.com
December 17, 2024 at 3:02 AM
For example, one of the signals is the ratio of current assets to EBITDA. The LLM creatively names the signal "Operating Liquidity Margin". One version hypothesizes that OLM predicts returns due to slow diffusion of information and cites Hirshleifer and Teoh's (2003) limited attention model.
The papers are remarkably coherent - they include creative names for the signals, contain custom introductions providing different hypotheses for the observed predictability patterns, and incorporate citations to existing (and, on occasion, imagined) literature.
December 17, 2024 at 3:02 AM
The papers are remarkably coherent - they include creative names for the signals, contain custom introductions providing different hypotheses for the observed predictability patterns, and incorporate citations to existing (and, on occasion, imagined) literature.
To assess this question we:
1⃣Mined 30K+ potential stock return predictors
2⃣Validated 96 robust signals using our "Assaying Anomalies" protocol
3⃣Used LLMs to generate 3 versions of complete papers for different hypotheses for each signal
Papers & code are available at:
github.com/velikov-miha...
1⃣Mined 30K+ potential stock return predictors
2⃣Validated 96 robust signals using our "Assaying Anomalies" protocol
3⃣Used LLMs to generate 3 versions of complete papers for different hypotheses for each signal
Papers & code are available at:
github.com/velikov-miha...
GitHub - velikov-mihail/AI-Powered-Scholarship: Code used in Novy-Marx and Velikov (2024), AI-Powered (Finance) Scholarship
Code used in Novy-Marx and Velikov (2024), AI-Powered (Finance) Scholarship - velikov-mihail/AI-Powered-Scholarship
github.com
December 17, 2024 at 3:02 AM
To assess this question we:
1⃣Mined 30K+ potential stock return predictors
2⃣Validated 96 robust signals using our "Assaying Anomalies" protocol
3⃣Used LLMs to generate 3 versions of complete papers for different hypotheses for each signal
Papers & code are available at:
github.com/velikov-miha...
1⃣Mined 30K+ potential stock return predictors
2⃣Validated 96 robust signals using our "Assaying Anomalies" protocol
3⃣Used LLMs to generate 3 versions of complete papers for different hypotheses for each signal
Papers & code are available at:
github.com/velikov-miha...