Muuro
@muuro.bsky.social
Marxism with Texas characteristics.
Mazovism-Nilsenism is the highest form of Mazovism.
Mazovism-Nilsenism is the highest form of Mazovism.
I already said what this was about the whole time. You are just coping.
September 23, 2025 at 7:14 PM
I already said what this was about the whole time. You are just coping.
You mean where you posted s pic of Rashida Talib?
September 23, 2025 at 6:03 PM
You mean where you posted s pic of Rashida Talib?
Bro that is what the argument has always been. You are trying to move the goal posts in the funniest way.
You even posted a picture of a congress representative.
Fucking lol.
You even posted a picture of a congress representative.
Fucking lol.
September 21, 2025 at 11:31 PM
Bro that is what the argument has always been. You are trying to move the goal posts in the funniest way.
You even posted a picture of a congress representative.
Fucking lol.
You even posted a picture of a congress representative.
Fucking lol.
No you didn't. And I explained to you why you didn't.
You are just stupid at this point.
You are just stupid at this point.
September 21, 2025 at 1:02 AM
No you didn't. And I explained to you why you didn't.
You are just stupid at this point.
You are just stupid at this point.
Bro who is being dishonest now? That stemmed from "both being pro genocide". This means neither supports. This means that legislation wouldn't pass.
I understand you people are dishonest as duck, but lol.
I understand you people are dishonest as duck, but lol.
September 20, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Bro who is being dishonest now? That stemmed from "both being pro genocide". This means neither supports. This means that legislation wouldn't pass.
I understand you people are dishonest as duck, but lol.
I understand you people are dishonest as duck, but lol.
I never moved the goal post. That was always part of the argument. As I said, for majority to support to support a thing, then policy has to pass that supports the thing. These two directly relate.
You were just arguing to argue.
You were just arguing to argue.
September 19, 2025 at 4:42 PM
I never moved the goal post. That was always part of the argument. As I said, for majority to support to support a thing, then policy has to pass that supports the thing. These two directly relate.
You were just arguing to argue.
You were just arguing to argue.
Yes, majority of support to pass. It didn't pass. Meaning there isn't majority support. This is what I always said. I was always correct. You lose. Thanks for playing.
Fin.
Fin.
September 18, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Yes, majority of support to pass. It didn't pass. Meaning there isn't majority support. This is what I always said. I was always correct. You lose. Thanks for playing.
Fin.
Fin.
You need a majority to support. I said there is no majority. The bill didn't pass. Therefore there is no majority. Therefore I am correct.
Fin.
Fin.
September 17, 2025 at 9:50 PM
You need a majority to support. I said there is no majority. The bill didn't pass. Therefore there is no majority. Therefore I am correct.
Fin.
Fin.
Not proof. I already stated that. This is because these things did not pass.
September 17, 2025 at 3:09 AM
Not proof. I already stated that. This is because these things did not pass.
And you didn't prove it.
September 16, 2025 at 7:36 PM
And you didn't prove it.
Because I said you didn't contradict me in as many words before you said the same.
September 15, 2025 at 9:53 PM
Because I said you didn't contradict me in as many words before you said the same.
So basically "no u" in response. Nice.
September 14, 2025 at 9:48 PM
So basically "no u" in response. Nice.
Cool. Did it pass? No? Thanks for playing.
September 14, 2025 at 1:00 AM
Cool. Did it pass? No? Thanks for playing.
The point was actions. You have a shit point with an image of one person, when if the whole party truly supported an issue then when they had power shit would get done.
September 13, 2025 at 12:56 AM
The point was actions. You have a shit point with an image of one person, when if the whole party truly supported an issue then when they had power shit would get done.
Aesthetics. What matters is actions.
September 10, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Aesthetics. What matters is actions.
I misread that as Charlie KKKirk at first.
September 10, 2025 at 9:13 PM
I misread that as Charlie KKKirk at first.
What's the text on that?
(I will regret this as math proofs are painful to read.)
(I will regret this as math proofs are painful to read.)
September 10, 2025 at 3:14 AM
What's the text on that?
(I will regret this as math proofs are painful to read.)
(I will regret this as math proofs are painful to read.)
There you are again! Lmao.
September 9, 2025 at 7:55 PM
There you are again! Lmao.
