Nick Murray-Smith
@murrth.bsky.social
Ok - I don't know... but I would like to learn.
Interested in "having a society", tech, art and people.
If you can’t appreciate the absurd, you're probably gonna have a bad time 😵💫🫠
Interested in "having a society", tech, art and people.
If you can’t appreciate the absurd, you're probably gonna have a bad time 😵💫🫠
HEE HEE HEE, HOH HOH HOH...
December 9, 2025 at 12:10 AM
HEE HEE HEE, HOH HOH HOH...
Scuse me… but if there’s no war aren’t these just normal crimes?
Heinous and deeply upsetting - but this is just unprovoked murder with high powered weaponry.
The punishments should be worse than for war crimes.
Heinous and deeply upsetting - but this is just unprovoked murder with high powered weaponry.
The punishments should be worse than for war crimes.
December 8, 2025 at 1:20 AM
Scuse me… but if there’s no war aren’t these just normal crimes?
Heinous and deeply upsetting - but this is just unprovoked murder with high powered weaponry.
The punishments should be worse than for war crimes.
Heinous and deeply upsetting - but this is just unprovoked murder with high powered weaponry.
The punishments should be worse than for war crimes.
Pair that with a slight uptick in the proportion of mean and incompetent men and you’ve got yourself a crisis!
December 6, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Pair that with a slight uptick in the proportion of mean and incompetent men and you’ve got yourself a crisis!
This is mudb. lol
We all know they prefer dilk, straight frod their dother’s ummers.
We all know they prefer dilk, straight frod their dother’s ummers.
December 6, 2025 at 9:54 AM
This is mudb. lol
We all know they prefer dilk, straight frod their dother’s ummers.
We all know they prefer dilk, straight frod their dother’s ummers.
What I pointed out is logical implication of what you wrote.
If it's a privilege - it can be revoked.
If these are requirements to attain the privilege - it seems logical they should be requirements of maintaining that privilege.
If it's a privilege - it can be revoked.
If these are requirements to attain the privilege - it seems logical they should be requirements of maintaining that privilege.
December 3, 2025 at 1:11 AM
What I pointed out is logical implication of what you wrote.
If it's a privilege - it can be revoked.
If these are requirements to attain the privilege - it seems logical they should be requirements of maintaining that privilege.
If it's a privilege - it can be revoked.
If these are requirements to attain the privilege - it seems logical they should be requirements of maintaining that privilege.
Reposted by Nick Murray-Smith
And while this is more helpful than cute?
電 is "electric." and it's really distinctive-looking.
So even if you don't recognize a word, it's a great clue.
電話 (electric story) is phone.
電車 (electric car) is train.
電池 (electric pond!) is battery!
電 is "electric." and it's really distinctive-looking.
So even if you don't recognize a word, it's a great clue.
電話 (electric story) is phone.
電車 (electric car) is train.
電池 (electric pond!) is battery!
December 2, 2025 at 9:33 PM
And while this is more helpful than cute?
電 is "electric." and it's really distinctive-looking.
So even if you don't recognize a word, it's a great clue.
電話 (electric story) is phone.
電車 (electric car) is train.
電池 (electric pond!) is battery!
電 is "electric." and it's really distinctive-looking.
So even if you don't recognize a word, it's a great clue.
電話 (electric story) is phone.
電車 (electric car) is train.
電池 (electric pond!) is battery!
So you're saying we should strip citizenship from those who don't respect "laws, people, principles, or Constitution"?
Cause it sounds like that would apply to a significant portion of this administration and the GOP...
Cause it sounds like that would apply to a significant portion of this administration and the GOP...
December 2, 2025 at 11:12 PM
So you're saying we should strip citizenship from those who don't respect "laws, people, principles, or Constitution"?
Cause it sounds like that would apply to a significant portion of this administration and the GOP...
Cause it sounds like that would apply to a significant portion of this administration and the GOP...
Reposted by Nick Murray-Smith
Shame only works on people who care about principles or other people…
But consequences… yeah we need more of that.
But consequences… yeah we need more of that.
December 2, 2025 at 6:23 PM
Shame only works on people who care about principles or other people…
But consequences… yeah we need more of that.
But consequences… yeah we need more of that.
Trump was scamming US taxpayers in his first term *before* Biden was president and has escalated his scamming and grifting exponentially in his second term.
He has become an even worse version of himself.
He has become an even worse version of himself.
December 2, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Trump was scamming US taxpayers in his first term *before* Biden was president and has escalated his scamming and grifting exponentially in his second term.
He has become an even worse version of himself.
He has become an even worse version of himself.
The specifics of consonance and dissonance may be determined by culture and experiences - but the actual perception of specific intervals etc. comes down to harmonics and comparing frequencies.
The math is there whether we’re aware of it or not.
The math is there whether we’re aware of it or not.
December 2, 2025 at 5:42 PM
The specifics of consonance and dissonance may be determined by culture and experiences - but the actual perception of specific intervals etc. comes down to harmonics and comparing frequencies.
The math is there whether we’re aware of it or not.
The math is there whether we’re aware of it or not.
But their ears and brain know the math, even of on an explicit level, the person does not.
December 2, 2025 at 5:27 PM
But their ears and brain know the math, even of on an explicit level, the person does not.
Hey genius, what part of Fulnecky’s essay showed critical thought?
The main takeaway is she thinks traditional sexual stereotypes are godly and everything else is lies from Satan…
Doesn’t sound like she put any thought into it at all and is merely parroting dogma.
The main takeaway is she thinks traditional sexual stereotypes are godly and everything else is lies from Satan…
Doesn’t sound like she put any thought into it at all and is merely parroting dogma.
December 1, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Hey genius, what part of Fulnecky’s essay showed critical thought?
The main takeaway is she thinks traditional sexual stereotypes are godly and everything else is lies from Satan…
Doesn’t sound like she put any thought into it at all and is merely parroting dogma.
The main takeaway is she thinks traditional sexual stereotypes are godly and everything else is lies from Satan…
Doesn’t sound like she put any thought into it at all and is merely parroting dogma.