@mr-tumbleweed.bsky.social
she weirdly cuts herself off at "information that has come fort--"
why would you cut that off & change it... seems like she knows "that has come forth" is a lie & backtracks & struggles to say even less
why would you cut that off & change it... seems like she knows "that has come forth" is a lie & backtracks & struggles to say even less
November 20, 2025 at 8:12 AM
she weirdly cuts herself off at "information that has come fort--"
why would you cut that off & change it... seems like she knows "that has come forth" is a lie & backtracks & struggles to say even less
why would you cut that off & change it... seems like she knows "that has come forth" is a lie & backtracks & struggles to say even less
I've seen several of your interviews (but haven't read your books), have you looked at an issue beyond the 'fear of rejection', of simply not knowing what to say (beyond any initial ice breaker), just not how to have conversations in general?
November 16, 2025 at 6:28 AM
I've seen several of your interviews (but haven't read your books), have you looked at an issue beyond the 'fear of rejection', of simply not knowing what to say (beyond any initial ice breaker), just not how to have conversations in general?
oblivious that all pre-existing conditions people are screwed
not that he's ever understood any topic ever, this one in particular, like him lying "i want to keep the pre-existing!" in prior attempts to kill Obamacare... like he does with "nuclear", not realizing another word is supposed to follow
not that he's ever understood any topic ever, this one in particular, like him lying "i want to keep the pre-existing!" in prior attempts to kill Obamacare... like he does with "nuclear", not realizing another word is supposed to follow
November 15, 2025 at 6:45 PM
oblivious that all pre-existing conditions people are screwed
not that he's ever understood any topic ever, this one in particular, like him lying "i want to keep the pre-existing!" in prior attempts to kill Obamacare... like he does with "nuclear", not realizing another word is supposed to follow
not that he's ever understood any topic ever, this one in particular, like him lying "i want to keep the pre-existing!" in prior attempts to kill Obamacare... like he does with "nuclear", not realizing another word is supposed to follow
i know he says "think of this" as realized he misread "are" as "and" (& can never acknowledge any mistake no matter how small)
but still confused by the rest of that sentence... he must've missed whole words (then some "adopt"s instead of "adapt"s)
but still confused by the rest of that sentence... he must've missed whole words (then some "adopt"s instead of "adapt"s)
November 13, 2025 at 8:24 PM
i know he says "think of this" as realized he misread "are" as "and" (& can never acknowledge any mistake no matter how small)
but still confused by the rest of that sentence... he must've missed whole words (then some "adopt"s instead of "adapt"s)
but still confused by the rest of that sentence... he must've missed whole words (then some "adopt"s instead of "adapt"s)
there wasn't a good way out, the D demand was only a band-aid at best, wouldn't have solved anything
better to note R's willingness to starve people, plus the inevitable health insurance problem is on them to deal with
better to note R's willingness to starve people, plus the inevitable health insurance problem is on them to deal with
November 10, 2025 at 12:39 AM
there wasn't a good way out, the D demand was only a band-aid at best, wouldn't have solved anything
better to note R's willingness to starve people, plus the inevitable health insurance problem is on them to deal with
better to note R's willingness to starve people, plus the inevitable health insurance problem is on them to deal with
they aren't "terrorists", whether drugs on the boats isn't the issue
November 6, 2025 at 8:03 AM
they aren't "terrorists", whether drugs on the boats isn't the issue
i checked, she didn't... as w/ all 'reporters'...
November 3, 2025 at 4:00 AM
i checked, she didn't... as w/ all 'reporters'...
did she push back on that claim that he's said for years with ZERO evidence??
i don't understand all the reporters covering this continual liar who just let this nonsense slide...
i don't understand all the reporters covering this continual liar who just let this nonsense slide...
November 3, 2025 at 3:52 AM
did she push back on that claim that he's said for years with ZERO evidence??
i don't understand all the reporters covering this continual liar who just let this nonsense slide...
i don't understand all the reporters covering this continual liar who just let this nonsense slide...
if she didn't push back on him claiming 'only beef' & 'we'll solve quickly', then interview worthless
November 3, 2025 at 12:51 AM
if she didn't push back on him claiming 'only beef' & 'we'll solve quickly', then interview worthless
the Faux/insane/cult media is claiming Arctic Frost a big scandal, & pretending real media covering up
why not cover the fake 'scandal' & note how it makes COMPLETE sense for many people to have been investigated as the corrupt acts as detailed in the Smith & GA indictments involved many people
why not cover the fake 'scandal' & note how it makes COMPLETE sense for many people to have been investigated as the corrupt acts as detailed in the Smith & GA indictments involved many people
November 1, 2025 at 2:57 AM
the Faux/insane/cult media is claiming Arctic Frost a big scandal, & pretending real media covering up
why not cover the fake 'scandal' & note how it makes COMPLETE sense for many people to have been investigated as the corrupt acts as detailed in the Smith & GA indictments involved many people
why not cover the fake 'scandal' & note how it makes COMPLETE sense for many people to have been investigated as the corrupt acts as detailed in the Smith & GA indictments involved many people
hey Faux, ever asked WHY is it appropriate for a president to 'troll' the public about violating the spirit of the constitution? (or at all)
he's either NOT trolling...(how many times have you idiots claimed he was 'just joking', when he wasn't)... OR it's obviously inappropriate trolling, pick 1
he's either NOT trolling...(how many times have you idiots claimed he was 'just joking', when he wasn't)... OR it's obviously inappropriate trolling, pick 1
October 28, 2025 at 11:51 PM
hey Faux, ever asked WHY is it appropriate for a president to 'troll' the public about violating the spirit of the constitution? (or at all)
he's either NOT trolling...(how many times have you idiots claimed he was 'just joking', when he wasn't)... OR it's obviously inappropriate trolling, pick 1
he's either NOT trolling...(how many times have you idiots claimed he was 'just joking', when he wasn't)... OR it's obviously inappropriate trolling, pick 1
and are any just being kidnapped (by fake or even real agents)?
as being masked & unidentifiable is the norm for the goon squads & they are mass recruiting presumably lots of garbage people...
as being masked & unidentifiable is the norm for the goon squads & they are mass recruiting presumably lots of garbage people...
October 28, 2025 at 9:32 PM
and are any just being kidnapped (by fake or even real agents)?
as being masked & unidentifiable is the norm for the goon squads & they are mass recruiting presumably lots of garbage people...
as being masked & unidentifiable is the norm for the goon squads & they are mass recruiting presumably lots of garbage people...
..and that's why R's will -never- agree
Trump's behavior WAS indefensible, NONE of them ever tried to do so
(just dumb claims of he "could have" declassified, yet he definitely didn't... plus is on tape acknowledging he didn't... or the defense Trump landed on of 'i can take any i want' (FALSE))
Trump's behavior WAS indefensible, NONE of them ever tried to do so
(just dumb claims of he "could have" declassified, yet he definitely didn't... plus is on tape acknowledging he didn't... or the defense Trump landed on of 'i can take any i want' (FALSE))
October 28, 2025 at 8:41 PM
..and that's why R's will -never- agree
Trump's behavior WAS indefensible, NONE of them ever tried to do so
(just dumb claims of he "could have" declassified, yet he definitely didn't... plus is on tape acknowledging he didn't... or the defense Trump landed on of 'i can take any i want' (FALSE))
Trump's behavior WAS indefensible, NONE of them ever tried to do so
(just dumb claims of he "could have" declassified, yet he definitely didn't... plus is on tape acknowledging he didn't... or the defense Trump landed on of 'i can take any i want' (FALSE))
Jack Smith doesn't "want a spectacle", he wants R's not to be able to hide the testimony & only cherry-pick & mislead
Trump grossly & clearly violated the law in completely indefensible ways (hence why NO defense was ever given for him refusing to return the docs, & even hide from his own lawyer)
Trump grossly & clearly violated the law in completely indefensible ways (hence why NO defense was ever given for him refusing to return the docs, & even hide from his own lawyer)
October 28, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Jack Smith doesn't "want a spectacle", he wants R's not to be able to hide the testimony & only cherry-pick & mislead
Trump grossly & clearly violated the law in completely indefensible ways (hence why NO defense was ever given for him refusing to return the docs, & even hide from his own lawyer)
Trump grossly & clearly violated the law in completely indefensible ways (hence why NO defense was ever given for him refusing to return the docs, & even hide from his own lawyer)
also he has no legal authority to just slap on extra 10% tariffs as he's having a tantrum
all his tariffs have been fake 'national security threats', an ad is definitely not a national security threat...
all his tariffs have been fake 'national security threats', an ad is definitely not a national security threat...
October 28, 2025 at 8:04 PM
also he has no legal authority to just slap on extra 10% tariffs as he's having a tantrum
all his tariffs have been fake 'national security threats', an ad is definitely not a national security threat...
all his tariffs have been fake 'national security threats', an ad is definitely not a national security threat...
you are mistaken, Trump says his approval numbers are higher than they've ever been, and he never lies..................
October 28, 2025 at 7:53 PM
you are mistaken, Trump says his approval numbers are higher than they've ever been, and he never lies..................
kinda been obvious forever there, Faux, as they don't have a case
they were trying desperately to just get him to plead guilty while spreading lies about his supposed crimes, not charging him w/ hardly any of them (including, disgustingly, the AG Pam Bondi)
they were trying desperately to just get him to plead guilty while spreading lies about his supposed crimes, not charging him w/ hardly any of them (including, disgustingly, the AG Pam Bondi)
October 28, 2025 at 2:34 AM
kinda been obvious forever there, Faux, as they don't have a case
they were trying desperately to just get him to plead guilty while spreading lies about his supposed crimes, not charging him w/ hardly any of them (including, disgustingly, the AG Pam Bondi)
they were trying desperately to just get him to plead guilty while spreading lies about his supposed crimes, not charging him w/ hardly any of them (including, disgustingly, the AG Pam Bondi)
using what legal authority?
October 25, 2025 at 11:01 PM
using what legal authority?
so who actually can do something about Trump's constant BS 'national security threat' tariffs?
the Brazil ones extra clearly corrupt too
is it entirely up to the worthless R's in Congress?
the Brazil ones extra clearly corrupt too
is it entirely up to the worthless R's in Congress?
October 25, 2025 at 11:00 PM
so who actually can do something about Trump's constant BS 'national security threat' tariffs?
the Brazil ones extra clearly corrupt too
is it entirely up to the worthless R's in Congress?
the Brazil ones extra clearly corrupt too
is it entirely up to the worthless R's in Congress?
so he will conveniently have to pay $0 of his own money...
but of course he won't stop claiming he's paying for it...
but of course he won't stop claiming he's paying for it...
October 25, 2025 at 5:42 AM
so he will conveniently have to pay $0 of his own money...
but of course he won't stop claiming he's paying for it...
but of course he won't stop claiming he's paying for it...
did any reporter note he's fucking wrong, like ~100% of the time he says anything...
October 25, 2025 at 5:31 AM
did any reporter note he's fucking wrong, like ~100% of the time he says anything...
is it clear if the office space is returning?
or are they stretching "modernized" & "upgraded" to not only mean demolished but also not replaced
or are they stretching "modernized" & "upgraded" to not only mean demolished but also not replaced
October 24, 2025 at 8:08 PM
is it clear if the office space is returning?
or are they stretching "modernized" & "upgraded" to not only mean demolished but also not replaced
or are they stretching "modernized" & "upgraded" to not only mean demolished but also not replaced
so exactly like what they complained Hunter Biden doing... but w/ more clear results...
October 24, 2025 at 6:54 PM
so exactly like what they complained Hunter Biden doing... but w/ more clear results...