Ah interesting, thanks. Some sort of dispositional account seems right to me, so I'm keen to see their arguments against it

There's a dispositional account in the vicinity that seems to get around that objection. Do they discuss it? (I should just read the paper...)

Continuum hypothesis in shambles

That neuroscientist was *so* confident that philosophy was antequated nonsense, just like this neuroscientist. And yet they ridiculed opposing views. (Though I think in both cases they didn't really understand what their target was saying.)

Neuroscience needs more philosophy.

the links only work in a nearby possible website

A thought- could it be that there's an implicit goal of providing a reductive account of the constructed category, and an assumption that you'd need this other property to provide that reduction? Not to endorse the assumptions, but I wonder if this is going on in the background

There's a bluesky "philosophical underclass" feed, but it seems not to have caught on yet
bsky.app/profile/did:...

Maybe it's taken a liking to shrimp

you have to be limber if you want to demonstrate an illusion of amodal completion with your body

It seems inevitable, though maybe not as a bias in the model so much as hidden cues in prompts. Google could easily feed Adsense data into prompts as a low-tech method. Sorta surprising we haven't seen it yet

nozick uses the term in philosophical explanations, so i'd guess johnston picked it up there. dunno if it was used earlier

Newer models allow users to upload pdfs

I'm only seeing blue ones, but maybe the descriptions here will give you clues
www.etsy.com/listing/1314...
www.etsy.com/listing/1536...
www.etsy.com/ca/listing/1...

Thanks for making this. Addition: bsky.app/profile/bria...

oh thank god

yeah, i suppose it's just a more sophisticated modeling technique. I agree it won't be useful for genuinely new psychology without validating on humans