Peter Moleman
@molemanpeter.bsky.social
Brain explorer: I study the brain and write short assays, see my website: https://breininactie.com/the-brain-in-action/.
R. Feynman: I’m an explorer? I get curious about everything, and I want to investigate all kinds of stuff.
R. Feynman: I’m an explorer? I get curious about everything, and I want to investigate all kinds of stuff.
Reposted by Peter Moleman
My test is 99% accurate and predicts that your child will grow to between 5 and 6.5 feet have an IQ between 80 and 130 and live 60-90 years. AND I don’t need any DNA to do my test…
November 10, 2025 at 10:52 PM
My test is 99% accurate and predicts that your child will grow to between 5 and 6.5 feet have an IQ between 80 and 130 and live 60-90 years. AND I don’t need any DNA to do my test…
Not "fell for such clear fairytales." but payed for such clear fairytales.
November 9, 2025 at 3:57 PM
Not "fell for such clear fairytales." but payed for such clear fairytales.
Reposted by Peter Moleman
I'm not saying we don't have "systems that rival human intelligence in key tasks" (though "key" is doing some heavy lifting). I'm saying that if you're going to make this your definition of AGI, you've been taking the piss all along.
November 6, 2025 at 9:16 PM
I'm not saying we don't have "systems that rival human intelligence in key tasks" (though "key" is doing some heavy lifting). I'm saying that if you're going to make this your definition of AGI, you've been taking the piss all along.
Nagel: "What is it like to be matter?" @nigelwarburton.bsky.social
November 1, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Nagel: "What is it like to be matter?" @nigelwarburton.bsky.social
Als iemand zegt: "Je zult moeten begrijpen" dan is dat voor mij reden niet in gesprek te gaan.
October 17, 2025 at 1:25 PM
Als iemand zegt: "Je zult moeten begrijpen" dan is dat voor mij reden niet in gesprek te gaan.
Reposted by Peter Moleman
I argue that the important question is not, as commonly assumed, about categorical vs dimensional systems, but rather (agreeing with Meehl) about whether observable surface structure is a reflection of low-level causal mechanisms. Disagreeing with Meehl, I conclude that the answer is usually no. /2
October 8, 2025 at 3:18 PM
I argue that the important question is not, as commonly assumed, about categorical vs dimensional systems, but rather (agreeing with Meehl) about whether observable surface structure is a reflection of low-level causal mechanisms. Disagreeing with Meehl, I conclude that the answer is usually no. /2