MenschenToaster
@menschentoaster.bsky.social
David | he/him | 19 y/o | 🇦🇹 austrian hobby dev with a passion for Minecraft projects
👑 Owner of @cafestu.be
👨💻 Working with Kotlin, Java, Go, Java-/TypeScript and ocasionally Python
My Github: https://github.com/davidmayr
👑 Owner of @cafestu.be
👨💻 Working with Kotlin, Java, Go, Java-/TypeScript and ocasionally Python
My Github: https://github.com/davidmayr
Could it be the case that it was there all the time? Since it redirects me to the Settings App every time, they might have just skipped changing it?
September 1, 2025 at 12:06 AM
Could it be the case that it was there all the time? Since it redirects me to the Settings App every time, they might have just skipped changing it?
This might suggest a spike in users switching to thunderbird?
It might get shown there since many people were linking their o365 account to thunderbird (via their oauth thingy) recently? Would make sense in combination with the other products shown.
It might get shown there since many people were linking their o365 account to thunderbird (via their oauth thingy) recently? Would make sense in combination with the other products shown.
July 28, 2025 at 11:19 PM
This might suggest a spike in users switching to thunderbird?
It might get shown there since many people were linking their o365 account to thunderbird (via their oauth thingy) recently? Would make sense in combination with the other products shown.
It might get shown there since many people were linking their o365 account to thunderbird (via their oauth thingy) recently? Would make sense in combination with the other products shown.
Unrelated, but slow down a bit lmao
April 16, 2025 at 9:34 PM
Unrelated, but slow down a bit lmao
They should "extremely optimize" the whole game and make all blocks have one texture and recolor it in code
March 19, 2025 at 11:27 AM
They should "extremely optimize" the whole game and make all blocks have one texture and recolor it in code
I get that. But that still makes it a not-so-nice experience that my 1k phone isnt allowed to have a better looking site.
Also, I somewhat doubt that the actual performance impact is that bad
Also, I somewhat doubt that the actual performance impact is that bad
March 4, 2025 at 5:03 AM
I get that. But that still makes it a not-so-nice experience that my 1k phone isnt allowed to have a better looking site.
Also, I somewhat doubt that the actual performance impact is that bad
Also, I somewhat doubt that the actual performance impact is that bad
There are so many people hating on Android because the only Android device they used cost 50€ from Temu or smth or is 9 years old
I get that people need affordable devices but this cant be the way Android moves forward. It only hurts the ecosystem.
I get that people need affordable devices but this cant be the way Android moves forward. It only hurts the ecosystem.
March 4, 2025 at 1:17 AM
There are so many people hating on Android because the only Android device they used cost 50€ from Temu or smth or is 9 years old
I get that people need affordable devices but this cant be the way Android moves forward. It only hurts the ecosystem.
I get that people need affordable devices but this cant be the way Android moves forward. It only hurts the ecosystem.
Well, yeah, but why does Android always need to suffer from low end devices?
I'm sure my S24U can handle the blur just fine. Sure, these low end devices need it to be optimized, I agree. But then again, I like my software to look good on a 1k phone.
Android suffers a lot from shitty devices tbh
I'm sure my S24U can handle the blur just fine. Sure, these low end devices need it to be optimized, I agree. But then again, I like my software to look good on a 1k phone.
Android suffers a lot from shitty devices tbh
March 4, 2025 at 1:17 AM
Well, yeah, but why does Android always need to suffer from low end devices?
I'm sure my S24U can handle the blur just fine. Sure, these low end devices need it to be optimized, I agree. But then again, I like my software to look good on a 1k phone.
Android suffers a lot from shitty devices tbh
I'm sure my S24U can handle the blur just fine. Sure, these low end devices need it to be optimized, I agree. But then again, I like my software to look good on a 1k phone.
Android suffers a lot from shitty devices tbh
Why is android web excluded?
March 4, 2025 at 1:07 AM
Why is android web excluded?
I don't know how slow that device is, but I see a lot of very low powered Samsung A Series phones around.
I'm not talking about the actually good midrangers in the A series, but about stuff like the A32 that my sister owned for a while. That thing was slow as heck
I'm not talking about the actually good midrangers in the A series, but about stuff like the A32 that my sister owned for a while. That thing was slow as heck
February 23, 2025 at 5:16 PM
I don't know how slow that device is, but I see a lot of very low powered Samsung A Series phones around.
I'm not talking about the actually good midrangers in the A series, but about stuff like the A32 that my sister owned for a while. That thing was slow as heck
I'm not talking about the actually good midrangers in the A series, but about stuff like the A32 that my sister owned for a while. That thing was slow as heck
Doesn't look too good right now
February 23, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Doesn't look too good right now
I really don't get the Java hate, to be honest
"Java 8" would have made me agree tho
"Java 8" would have made me agree tho
February 21, 2025 at 10:48 AM
I really don't get the Java hate, to be honest
"Java 8" would have made me agree tho
"Java 8" would have made me agree tho
So ein dicker Tumor würde einiges erklären
February 21, 2025 at 10:46 AM
So ein dicker Tumor würde einiges erklären
I actually don't mind it. Then again, I don't drink out of bottles that much
February 18, 2025 at 8:12 PM
I actually don't mind it. Then again, I don't drink out of bottles that much
Huh? Why is the translation broken?
February 18, 2025 at 12:48 AM
Huh? Why is the translation broken?
I needed this rn, thank you
February 17, 2025 at 10:06 PM
I needed this rn, thank you
That's what I realized when I read summaries or the few pages it allows you to read for free on Google Books.
As a Java Dev, I see another Java Dev instantly lmao
As a Java Dev, I see another Java Dev instantly lmao
February 17, 2025 at 7:35 AM
That's what I realized when I read summaries or the few pages it allows you to read for free on Google Books.
As a Java Dev, I see another Java Dev instantly lmao
As a Java Dev, I see another Java Dev instantly lmao
If this is about Javascript Frontend Frameworks, I generally don't understand it either.
But certain frameworks like to be very opinionated. As long as you follow their vision, it's easy. When you make something more different, you will potentially face more issues than raw dogging e.g. React
But certain frameworks like to be very opinionated. As long as you follow their vision, it's easy. When you make something more different, you will potentially face more issues than raw dogging e.g. React
February 17, 2025 at 7:32 AM
If this is about Javascript Frontend Frameworks, I generally don't understand it either.
But certain frameworks like to be very opinionated. As long as you follow their vision, it's easy. When you make something more different, you will potentially face more issues than raw dogging e.g. React
But certain frameworks like to be very opinionated. As long as you follow their vision, it's easy. When you make something more different, you will potentially face more issues than raw dogging e.g. React
And I always thought clean code was just a term for, well, clean code 😅
But yeah, the book seems quite useless then
But yeah, the book seems quite useless then
February 17, 2025 at 7:13 AM
And I always thought clean code was just a term for, well, clean code 😅
But yeah, the book seems quite useless then
But yeah, the book seems quite useless then
Oh, I get it now.
I was looking at a few very very short summary and the recommendations looked okay for the most part and were somewhat obvious, so I didnt get what the issue was.
Now I get it. Yeah, trying to "force" some rules is stupid, I fully agree
I was looking at a few very very short summary and the recommendations looked okay for the most part and were somewhat obvious, so I didnt get what the issue was.
Now I get it. Yeah, trying to "force" some rules is stupid, I fully agree
February 16, 2025 at 7:14 PM
Oh, I get it now.
I was looking at a few very very short summary and the recommendations looked okay for the most part and were somewhat obvious, so I didnt get what the issue was.
Now I get it. Yeah, trying to "force" some rules is stupid, I fully agree
I was looking at a few very very short summary and the recommendations looked okay for the most part and were somewhat obvious, so I didnt get what the issue was.
Now I get it. Yeah, trying to "force" some rules is stupid, I fully agree