Electronic AND hard copy submitted.

Too early for a drink? 🥃 🍸🍹

I mean, probably.

I’ve got Civil Procedure in an hour. ⚖️

🤷🏻‍♀️😂

Back to reading for Torts until then! 📖

To be honest, case summaries are MUCH more concise and read more clearly. There were, however, entire points of analysis that I had no choice but to completely remove.

Keep thinking about Civ Pro prof (the undeniable MVP of this semester) re: "What can be inferred from silence?"

You can't meaningfully engage with folks that feel entitled to their own version of reality.

It's not a moral failing to protect your peace.

Status quo has been break the law and then let the lawyers deal with it. HAVING the lawyers doesn't impact the propensity to break the law.

And, ultimately, regardless of legality, it's only going to matter to these folks if the law is ENFORCED as they have no respect for anyone/thing of value.

There's an alarming lack of awareness in suggesting that the legality of something has any impact at all on the the actions of this executive.

Kamala drew huge crowds, too.

It only matters if it translates into something real at the ballot box.