Megan Prictor
banner
meganprictor.bsky.social
Megan Prictor
@meganprictor.bsky.social
Lawyer, PhD. Snr Lecturer, law & emerging health tech at Melbourne Law School, Uni of Melbourne. Digital health, data governance, health law, regulation, clinical tech, consultation recording. + Cataract Kids Australia. Views are my own. RT≠endorsement.
Reposted by Megan Prictor
Submissions are now open in response to the Issues Paper, and the ALRC is inviting individuals and organisations to provide submissions until 11 July 2025.

Read the Issues Paper and learn more about the Review of Surrogacy Laws at: www.alrc.gov.au/publication/...
Review of Surrogacy Laws: Issues Paper (2025)
Submissions in response to the Issues Paper are now open. The Issues Paper introduces our inquiry and explains what we have been asked to do. It provides a brief overview of surrogacy laws in Australi...
www.alrc.gov.au
June 3, 2025 at 5:07 AM
3/3 Patients often recorded because they did not TRUST their healthcare provider. Importantly, there are no cases about consented recordings made for broader patient benefit. Lawful, mutually agreed recordings of healthcare consultations present very low risk of adverse medico-legal consequences.
March 15, 2025 at 10:07 PM
2/3, Most of the consultation recordings were made in the context of pre-existing conflicts. mainly involving personal injury, professional misconduct, and family law. Recordings had the greatest value in matters involving professional misconduct. In other matters, findings were mixed....
March 15, 2025 at 10:07 PM
There's a platypus in there somewhere
January 23, 2025 at 9:07 PM