Hmm, interesting. I wonder if the IOC has considered this loophole and if it could be exploited
November 13, 2025 at 6:21 PM
Hmm, interesting. I wonder if the IOC has considered this loophole and if it could be exploited
Which bit? This is fully in agreement with Charles' claim
November 13, 2025 at 4:24 PM
Which bit? This is fully in agreement with Charles' claim
The claim is that there are SRY negative male people. Have you got evidence for that?
November 13, 2025 at 12:33 PM
The claim is that there are SRY negative male people. Have you got evidence for that?
"Safe and effective" is a balance. It's not true to say that there are no negative health impacts for this, or any drug. It's also about what positive outcomes are expected and that's where the controversy lies
November 12, 2025 at 7:58 AM
"Safe and effective" is a balance. It's not true to say that there are no negative health impacts for this, or any drug. It's also about what positive outcomes are expected and that's where the controversy lies
Zero qualms, undoubtedly
Evidence however...
Evidence however...
November 11, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Zero qualms, undoubtedly
Evidence however...
Evidence however...
A drug being safe and effective for one cohort doesn't mean it's safe and effective for another
November 11, 2025 at 10:04 PM
A drug being safe and effective for one cohort doesn't mean it's safe and effective for another
There doesn't appear to be any form of trans activism (at least online) that doesn't rely on denying the reality of sex. It's doomed to failure because of that
November 11, 2025 at 9:27 PM
There doesn't appear to be any form of trans activism (at least online) that doesn't rely on denying the reality of sex. It's doomed to failure because of that
Reposted by Mat
Please, just a little bit of child poverty reduced and a nicer public realm, for a treat
November 11, 2025 at 7:50 PM
Please, just a little bit of child poverty reduced and a nicer public realm, for a treat
That sex is an important descriptor in certain circumstances and that sex can't be changed
November 11, 2025 at 8:25 PM
That sex is an important descriptor in certain circumstances and that sex can't be changed
Good, hopefully it'll help people to understand what they're arguing against
November 11, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Good, hopefully it'll help people to understand what they're arguing against
Is something like this close to a way of representing SRY- v SRY+
November 11, 2025 at 7:23 PM
Is something like this close to a way of representing SRY- v SRY+
No men in my family have reached this "hypothetical 'peak'" either. Which category would they qualify for?
November 11, 2025 at 7:03 PM
No men in my family have reached this "hypothetical 'peak'" either. Which category would they qualify for?
November 11, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Here, you called me a "garbage human" because I couldn't find the thing you claimed in the article. But you can't find it either
bsky.app/profile/natu...
bsky.app/profile/natu...
November 11, 2025 at 6:43 PM
Here, you called me a "garbage human" because I couldn't find the thing you claimed in the article. But you can't find it either
bsky.app/profile/natu...
bsky.app/profile/natu...
"Being SRY negative is an absolute positive test for being female"
Where is the refutation of that? You were certain that it was in that article.
Where is the refutation of that? You were certain that it was in that article.
November 11, 2025 at 6:42 PM
"Being SRY negative is an absolute positive test for being female"
Where is the refutation of that? You were certain that it was in that article.
Where is the refutation of that? You were certain that it was in that article.
Yes, I read it. It doesn't mention SRY negative being male anywhere does it?
November 11, 2025 at 6:38 PM
Yes, I read it. It doesn't mention SRY negative being male anywhere does it?
He wrote "Being SRY negative is an absolute positive test for being female"
Where is this disputed in the piece you replied with?
Where is this disputed in the piece you replied with?
November 11, 2025 at 6:33 PM
He wrote "Being SRY negative is an absolute positive test for being female"
Where is this disputed in the piece you replied with?
Where is this disputed in the piece you replied with?
I can't see the part that refutes what Charles wrote?
November 11, 2025 at 6:25 PM
I can't see the part that refutes what Charles wrote?