Opdateringen kan læses her:
curis.ku.dk/ws/portalfil...

Vores hidtidige opdateringer mv. kan i øvrigt læses her:
jura.ku.dk/icourts/rese...

If true, possibly - but there was significant disagreement at the time.

At that time, NATO said that the RTS facilities were being used “as radio relay stations and transmitters to support the activities of the FRY military and special police forces, and therefore they represent legitimate military targets”. See: icty.org/sid/10052#IVB3

De fleste stopper analysen hér, men et mindretal mener, at atomforskere i helt ekstraordinære tilfælde alligevel kan angribes. Der henvises ofte til de centrale personer under anden verdenskrig. Det giver en vis logisk mening - men retligt synes jeg, at det er svært at forsvare.

Det er de som alt overvejende hovedregel ikke. Forskere, som er del af de væbnede styrker, vil generelt være det pga deres militære status - men ikke pga deres forskning. Civile forskere vil ikke. Kravet er, at de skal tage direkte del i fjendtlighederne - og forskeres bidrag er som regel indirekte.

The entire briefing note - which is only 11 pages - is really worth a read, as it is clear and explicit about both its assumptions and data:
openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/c...

The briefing note makes clear, however, that reports from Gaza on the exhaustion of supplies "suggests that the lower bound of these estimates may be more representative of the current situation than the upper bound."

This is about as strong language as you're going to get from the ICRC. When they do this, they mean it.

“… the fact that we are watching a people being entirely stripped of its human dignity should really shock our collective conscience.”

“State leaders are under an obligation to act.”

Det giver i hvert fald ikke mening, det han skriver. Folkedrab dækker blot over, at man begår de handlinger, som er beskrevet i folkedrabskonventionen (navnlig drab) med en folkedrabshensigt. Det er underordnet, hvordan det præcist gennemføres - udover, at lovlig krigsførelse nok ikke er dækket.

“…When it does this, and the IPC reports that the deterioration has been arrested, Israeli advocates claim that the famine story was made-up all along. That’s wrong.”

Jeremy Hill, Aust’s Modern Treaty Law and Practice (4. Edition, 2023)

Thomas Giegerich, Commentary to article 54 i Dörr & Schmalenbach’s Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, a commentary (2018) (materialet kan findes her: buff.ly/Qa1qlh7)

Björn Arp, Denunciation Followed by Re-accession with Reservations to a Treaty (2014) (materialet kan findes her: buff.ly/Ddownaf)

Laurence R. Helfer, Not Fully Committed? (2006) (materialet kan findes her: buff.ly/ph0g2Vr )