Mama Kestrel
mamakestrel.bsky.social
Mama Kestrel
@mamakestrel.bsky.social
I'm a retired attorney in the wilds of rural Northwest Indiana. I have hair of varying colors, and usually have crafts in my hand. Sometimes singing along in my head turns out to be out loud. Further affiant sayeth naught!
Yes.
November 12, 2025 at 1:20 AM
Because it indicates interest in a certain kind of epic science fiction or fantasy, would be my guess. It's a shortcut for where there might be mutual interest. They're geeks letting it be known that they'd like to meet other geeks.
November 6, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Oracular pig. Hen Wen. Lloyd Alexander's Chronicles of Prydain. Just saying.
October 8, 2025 at 2:22 PM
Every time I think it can't get worse...it does. I have degrees in both history and law; you'd think I would know better.
July 24, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Rushdie himself is not dangerous. It's he that would be endangered. He is a deeply polarizing figure, which is too bad. The level of security necessary for his safety at a college graduation is daunting to the university, and doing without that level of security unacceptable to him. So he canceled.
May 19, 2025 at 9:27 PM
Miss Diva of Clan Underfoot, all 6 1/2 pounds of her. A tiny girl (about 3) downtown today, dancing a twirling for the pure joy of it. Feline Federation Wrestling between Diva and her littermate Ebony, which generally ends in bathing each other.
May 2, 2025 at 3:49 AM
Heaven forfend there be a paper trail of a raging conflict of interest....
March 3, 2025 at 2:16 AM
USAID was investigating Starlink. And now they've been shut down. Do you think there might be a connection?
February 8, 2025 at 3:32 AM
Pronounced "doggy"?
February 8, 2025 at 3:26 AM
They don't want to see it, and don't believe it when told. Or the bought the "necessary housecleaning" line the Traitor in Chief has been selling for years.
February 2, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Rather like the presidential immunity ruling. Taney knew what result he wanted, and twisted and mangled the Constitution to get there.
January 26, 2025 at 12:10 AM
Could you get me a citation on that? 😜
January 25, 2025 at 3:55 AM
I'm hoping the cure for lawyer brain is retirement. Otherwise I'm doomed. (Retired in 2005; never looked back.)
January 25, 2025 at 1:22 AM
No disagreement. I meant only that the old EO was not the sole basis for challenge. I keep thinking of Andrew Jackson's response to the rulings in favor of the Cherokee: "They have made their ruling. Now let them enforce it."
January 22, 2025 at 12:34 PM
The cruelty is the point.
January 22, 2025 at 12:27 PM
It was codified. LBJ issued it while the Administrative Rules that interpret the statutes were being written.
January 22, 2025 at 5:52 AM
The Civil Rights Act, the Equal Employment Opportunities Act, and the American with Disabilities Act are all still there. LBJ's EO set out in the requirements before the administrative rules could be enacted, but the Administrative Code has supercedes it anyway.
January 22, 2025 at 5:47 AM
He's gonna try.
January 22, 2025 at 5:39 AM
No lies detected. It's purely performative.
January 21, 2025 at 11:57 PM
It only applies to children born after Feb 19, 2025. If it were made retroactive it would apply to me, too. I'm a retired attorney in my 60s who was born in Ohio.
January 21, 2025 at 11:55 PM
No lie detected.
January 21, 2025 at 8:11 PM
I figured it out and gave due credit on FB.
January 16, 2025 at 3:48 AM