Lukas Vogelsang
@lukasvogelsang.bsky.social
Simons Postdoctoral Fellow in Pawan Sinha's Lab at MIT. Experimental and computational approaches to vision, time, and development. Just joined Bluesky!
3/ Also, if I'm understanding it correctly, looking at Supplemental Figure 8E in Jang & Tong (2024) (www.nature.com/articles/s41...), it seems that the baseline AlexNet (red) had a shape bias of 0.4 as well, and strong blur (purple) then brought it up to around 0.7!
July 11, 2025 at 5:31 AM
3/ Also, if I'm understanding it correctly, looking at Supplemental Figure 8E in Jang & Tong (2024) (www.nature.com/articles/s41...), it seems that the baseline AlexNet (red) had a shape bias of 0.4 as well, and strong blur (purple) then brought it up to around 0.7!
2/ First: while any absolute values were certainly not the focus of our paper, we did check the baseline and found that it was really quite similar to Geirhos et al. (2019), who had >0.4 for AlexNet. Below is a screenshot from their paper (similar to our Supplementary Fig 14 you shared before).
July 11, 2025 at 5:31 AM
2/ First: while any absolute values were certainly not the focus of our paper, we did check the baseline and found that it was really quite similar to Geirhos et al. (2019), who had >0.4 for AlexNet. Below is a screenshot from their paper (similar to our Supplementary Fig 14 you shared before).