Or rather, the study section was still giving lots of good scores but the grants were just never funded. It was such a waste of so many scientists’ time on both sides.
August 20, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Or rather, the study section was still giving lots of good scores but the grants were just never funded. It was such a waste of so many scientists’ time on both sides.
Was this perhaps an NIGMS-heavy study section implementing their mostly-unannounced policy to pretty much stop funding R01s in favor of R35s (which go to different study sections)?
August 20, 2025 at 3:59 PM
Was this perhaps an NIGMS-heavy study section implementing their mostly-unannounced policy to pretty much stop funding R01s in favor of R35s (which go to different study sections)?
Yes, it's a discrete counting thing: think about the most extreme log2 fold change numbers you could observe if you start with 100 or 10 or 2 items and end up with 1 item.
August 9, 2025 at 10:24 PM
Yes, it's a discrete counting thing: think about the most extreme log2 fold change numbers you could observe if you start with 100 or 10 or 2 items and end up with 1 item.
That's really interesting - incidentally, we also have some work on how the speed of elongation might feed back on initiation (not in the context of membrane proteins, in this case, and no mechanism yet!). Definitely some interesting possibilities. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
That's really interesting - incidentally, we also have some work on how the speed of elongation might feed back on initiation (not in the context of membrane proteins, in this case, and no mechanism yet!). Definitely some interesting possibilities. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...