@legalwatcher.bsky.social
Have we ever chopped up an existing state into new states (WV comes to mind)? Seems like this usually happened with land that was part of a territory.
August 12, 2025 at 6:11 PM
Have we ever chopped up an existing state into new states (WV comes to mind)? Seems like this usually happened with land that was part of a territory.
I don’t understand. Justices speaking with non-hostile interviewers is common. Sotomayor has done interviews with Oprah, Colbert, Trevor Noah, Erwin Chemerinsky, Jorge Ramos. So what?
July 28, 2025 at 5:31 PM
I don’t understand. Justices speaking with non-hostile interviewers is common. Sotomayor has done interviews with Oprah, Colbert, Trevor Noah, Erwin Chemerinsky, Jorge Ramos. So what?
It absolutely provides the relief that actual *”plaintiffs”* gained. The whole dispute is over non plaintiffs / parties
July 1, 2025 at 4:19 PM
It absolutely provides the relief that actual *”plaintiffs”* gained. The whole dispute is over non plaintiffs / parties
KBJ’s critique was hardly straightforward. Her very opening paragraphs assume the answer (if one district court rules X is unconditional then it is so). Wonder if they thought that when Judge O’Connor was issuing national injunctions
June 28, 2025 at 3:20 PM
KBJ’s critique was hardly straightforward. Her very opening paragraphs assume the answer (if one district court rules X is unconditional then it is so). Wonder if they thought that when Judge O’Connor was issuing national injunctions
What case presented this question during Biden admin?
June 28, 2025 at 12:55 PM
What case presented this question during Biden admin?
Nondelegation isn’t important???
June 27, 2025 at 3:28 PM
Nondelegation isn’t important???
Also people old enough to have kids now did *not* grow up in this type of environment. A 24 year old was 10 in 2011….
June 6, 2025 at 3:17 PM
Also people old enough to have kids now did *not* grow up in this type of environment. A 24 year old was 10 in 2011….
Right so the answer is people then were ignorant. Much more information now. It’s really not baffling!
June 6, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Right so the answer is people then were ignorant. Much more information now. It’s really not baffling!
Doesn’t appear Wurman is on his own here
March 28, 2025 at 11:06 PM
Doesn’t appear Wurman is on his own here
Reposted
So interesting to watch on twitter Lash getting praise while on here the author opposed to Lash unleashes on him. I wish they would talk to each other bc I’m not smart enough to know anything.
March 22, 2025 at 4:04 PM
So interesting to watch on twitter Lash getting praise while on here the author opposed to Lash unleashes on him. I wish they would talk to each other bc I’m not smart enough to know anything.
So interesting to watch on twitter Lash getting praise while on here the author opposed to Lash unleashes on him. I wish they would talk to each other bc I’m not smart enough to know anything.
March 22, 2025 at 4:04 PM
So interesting to watch on twitter Lash getting praise while on here the author opposed to Lash unleashes on him. I wish they would talk to each other bc I’m not smart enough to know anything.
Yes. Posted this morning. Really looking forward to your take/response. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Prima Facie Citizenship: Birth, Allegiance and the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause
<p><span>The Fourteenth Amendment Citizenship Clause establishes two conditions for natural born citizenship. First, the person must be born in the United State
papers.ssrn.com
March 22, 2025 at 3:07 PM
Yes. Posted this morning. Really looking forward to your take/response. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Ok that makes sense thanks! Wanted to make sure I didn’t miss something!
March 22, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Ok that makes sense thanks! Wanted to make sure I didn’t miss something!
Also hoping to hear @anthonymkreis.bsky.social and @paulgowder.bsky.social response to Kurt Lash’s full essay now on SSRN
March 22, 2025 at 2:58 PM
Also hoping to hear @anthonymkreis.bsky.social and @paulgowder.bsky.social response to Kurt Lash’s full essay now on SSRN
Huh? They have no legitimate power?
March 1, 2025 at 12:44 AM
Huh? They have no legitimate power?
I mean yeah but for many of these examples there are legit legal arguments. Firing prosecutors? Firing an NLRB member? Firing inspectors general? There are very strong legal arguments that these are actions are within the executive power.
February 6, 2025 at 12:59 AM
I mean yeah but for many of these examples there are legit legal arguments. Firing prosecutors? Firing an NLRB member? Firing inspectors general? There are very strong legal arguments that these are actions are within the executive power.
Interesting take. Thanks.
December 12, 2024 at 3:56 AM
Interesting take. Thanks.
What is your take on the law review article cited there?
December 12, 2024 at 3:06 AM
What is your take on the law review article cited there?
This makes sense to me. I guess I’m not understanding where you and the professor disagree. Interesting debate.
December 7, 2024 at 12:27 AM
This makes sense to me. I guess I’m not understanding where you and the professor disagree. Interesting debate.
I read it! Sorry I’m not trying to be rude I’m trying to understand. I will step out and listen.
December 6, 2024 at 11:31 PM
I read it! Sorry I’m not trying to be rude I’m trying to understand. I will step out and listen.