nikki 🇬🇷🇰🇷🏳️‍🌈
banner
kweenikki.bsky.social
nikki 🇬🇷🇰🇷🏳️‍🌈
@kweenikki.bsky.social
loathed cinephile (she/her, any)

Indie film Producer, Writer, Actor. Gamer for life. Extremely ADHD+, disabled. SF/NYC

IG: @kweenikki
:( my worst fear ever. you're ok, it's ok! even if you did, we can't expect perfection and i know you just care about other people feeling safe ❤️
May 27, 2025 at 10:19 PM
all of it is
May 27, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Reposted by nikki 🇬🇷🇰🇷🏳️‍🌈
I remember people arguing to cut certain romances, and then I looked at the telemetry and pointed out that more people played some of those romances, percentage-wise, than played a dwarven Inquisitor or a rogue, so if we were looking for cuts, they were welcome to start there.
May 20, 2025 at 2:39 AM
Reposted by nikki 🇬🇷🇰🇷🏳️‍🌈
At some point, I think you do need to put the data aside. You need to ignore what players *think* they want and imagine what they *really* do - that's your role as a dev, and it's a scary one... particularly since convincing higher-up publisher types of that is nigh impossible. 😉
May 20, 2025 at 2:35 AM
Reposted by nikki 🇬🇷🇰🇷🏳️‍🌈
I suppose I should add: while it might seem otherwise, I don't think one type is better than the other. Using data to drive decisions is good - relying solely on anecdotal data and gut to drive all decisions is a path to its own sort of madness - but relying solely on it leaves no place for vision.
May 20, 2025 at 2:28 AM