#1 Eito Stan
ksmiles.bsky.social
#1 Eito Stan
@ksmiles.bsky.social
General nerd. Mostly into warhammer these days.
@clockwork353 from twitter
Guess who accidently tried to take a multi tool through security at the airport.
Operating on 3 hours of sleep is hard
December 7, 2025 at 10:08 AM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
what follows immediately after the birthright clause? the privileges and immunities and due process clauses? and what follows them? the equal protection clause. all of this is explicitly to say, "the declaration is the constitutional law of the land"
December 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
the birthright clause was not just written to wipe dred scott off of the books, it was written to repudiate the *idea* behind dred scott, you might say the larger *ideological project* of dred scott. and the whole of section 1 of the 14th amendment is a constitutional statement of political equality
December 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
dred scott, in their minds, established the united states as a place of tiered citizenship and permanent inequality among americans. it was a ruling that said, in effect, that all men *were not* created equal and would *never* be treated as such.
December 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
i think to understand the meaning of the birthright citizenship clause to the framers of the 14th amendment, you have to understand significance of dred scott to the civil war republican party. dred scott wasn't just a bad ruling, it was understood as a rejection of the declaration itself.
December 6, 2025 at 6:03 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
Our gorgeous #WakeUpDeadMan end credit portraits, painted from life by Isabella Watling. We’re still in theaters, see my pinned post for a theater finder!
December 6, 2025 at 4:45 PM
I really wonder why the tracks on the T aren’t welded together. Doesn’t the shape of the rails mean you don’t need expansion joints?
December 6, 2025 at 5:12 PM
@hoshizoralone.bsky.social is prime 4 worth it?
December 6, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
It starts with knowing the truth. Don’t allow yourselves to be gaslit into believing this is a real question.
December 6, 2025 at 2:44 PM
Oh yeah that’s right, you need a passport to travel inside the country now.
Absolutely horrible.
December 6, 2025 at 2:55 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
9/ 🔺 The governments of democratic states almost never celebrate their leaders' birthdays. The one exception, highly relevant to the US today, is that of the autocratic populist regime of Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte, who is currently awaiting trial at The Hague.
December 6, 2025 at 2:11 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
7/🔺 Romania's dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu’s birthday on January 26 was celebrated with huge rallies, songs, and mandatory gifts. He was shot on December 25, 1989, after being overthrown only a month before his 72nd birthday.
December 6, 2025 at 2:11 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
5/🔺 Nazi Germany made Hitler's birthday a public holiday (conveniently, Trump doesn't need to do this, as June 14 is already the federal Flag Day holiday), with parades and other events.
December 6, 2025 at 2:11 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
4/🔺 North Korea celebrates the birthdays of Kim Il-sung (April 15, "Day of the Sun") and Kim Jong-il (February 16, "Day of the Shining Star") with massive parades and other celebrations. These have continued even after their deaths.
December 6, 2025 at 2:11 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
1/ The US National Park Service has for the first time made access to its parks free on June 14, explicitly tying it to Donald Trump's birthday. The inauguration of a public celebration of the leader's birthday marks a very significant step on the road to authoritarianism in the US. ⬇️
December 6, 2025 at 2:11 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
Maine wants the guy with the nazi tattoo the way PA wanted the guy who picks up a gun when a Black person jogs past his house.

I guess I hope this works out better than that did.
December 6, 2025 at 2:51 AM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
this isn't fedposting, or shouldn't be. one of the penalties for what pete hegseth and general bradley has apparently done -- what bradley has admitted to -- is death. after a finding of precisely what he admitted to.
December 5, 2025 at 7:25 AM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
"the government should try, convict and then kill the secretary of defense for the crime he very obviously seems to have committed" seems like a radical thing to say, but -- no, it's not. it's the actual penalty for what pete hegseth, a man who ordered death squads to murder civilians, has done.
December 5, 2025 at 7:24 AM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
the thing is that blowing up drug boats is just murder. no law licenses it. it is just war crimes. but to say out loud what the penalty for committing them is puts us in the position of accusing high government officials of capital crimes.

it is critically important to be able to say the obvious.
December 5, 2025 at 7:21 AM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
people made fun of this in 2014 but every last thing about it turned out to be true
December 5, 2025 at 10:35 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
If birth in the United States does not confer citizenship, and if all citizen immigrants can be denaturalized by executive order, then literally no one in America has a guarantee of citizenship.

Every American’s citizenship becomes merely the revocable gift of the god-king.
December 5, 2025 at 7:27 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
Counterpoint:

The Supreme Court lacks the authority to change the text of the Constitution.

So either it affirms the text or (further, and more completely) nukes its authority as Constitutional arbiter.

There’s no third option. Art III (courts) can’t just usurp Art V (amendments).
npr.org NPR @npr.org · 1d
The Supreme Court will ultimately decide whether to uphold the longstanding principle that grants citizenship to the children of non-citizens born in the U.S., following a legal challenge by the Trump administration. n.pr/48E1oko
Supreme Court agrees to hear arguments in birthright citizenship challenge
The Supreme Court will ultimately decide whether to uphold the longstanding principle that grants citizenship to the children of non-citizens born in the U.S., following a legal challenge by the Trump administration.
n.pr
December 5, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Thought it was unfair empire wizards get familiar models and tomb king wizards don’t so I slapped this guy together. He was following one of my liche priests around waiting for the guy to die so he could eat him. Starved to death while waiting but didn’t notice. #warhammer
December 5, 2025 at 10:04 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
I actually think we should stop telling the people responsible for this country's problems that they're the innocent ones rather than the architects of what's happening to them

White voters in small towns earned this. They brought it on us all, and they should be blamed.
Like, I think this is a good basic pitch, but he's also pretty uninterested in actually landing that punch, he just found a rhetorical punch to land at other Democrats, namely:
December 5, 2025 at 6:55 PM
Reposted by #1 Eito Stan
looking forward to either a 6-3 decision that trump as God Emperor of the United States can change the constitution by fiat or a 5-4 decision that 14th amendment means what it says with a dissent from thomas that actually the constitution recognizes donald j. trump as sovereign
*SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW TRUMP’S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP ROLLBACK
December 5, 2025 at 6:57 PM