Thanks and sorry! Here is the link: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

3) Additionally, our research challenges the expected impact of empathetic communication on public support. Contrary to expectations, expressing empathy with citizens' concerns does not significantly increase public support for helping Ukrainian refugees.

2) Our findings reveal that while the Czech Prime Minister acknowledges the efforts of volunteers helping refugees, empathy towards citizens hesitant to offer help is notably absent from his communication.

This article wouldn’t exist without the brilliant minds and generous hearts that supported me along the way.💡
@alvarooleart.bsky.social — your discussion points were a masterclass in clarity and insight.🌟@karolinaboronska.bsky.social — thank you for pushing me to start this journey.

These themes align with academic critiques of the CoFoE and reinforce the Eurosceptic view of an "elite cartel" running the EU.

I explore how Eurosceptic groups challenged the CoFoE. I uncovered two major themes in their critique:1️⃣Claims of manipulative governance—that CoFoE was just a PR stunt by EU elites. 2️⃣ Allegations of lack of representativity—citizens weren’t truly represented.

3) On a theoretical level, we call for greater consideration of the role of culture and local context in the research on adolescents’ motivations for civic engagement. On policy level, it reveals conditions
under which youth become motivated to engage with the issue of migration.

2) These mechanisms help to explain why Czech adolescents felt the need to engage in helping refugees from Ukraine, even though migration was a distant topic for them until their arrival.

1) Our study shows that the close contact and perceived cultural closeness to immigrants act as a driving force in adolescents' engagement, fostering a sense of empathy and collective responsibility for their situation and living conditions.