For example, and this is what I was keen to show here, he works hard to show how intuition is a primary form of knowledge. He does this against the backdrop of the neo-Kantian privileging of understanding.

It's true that he located imagination as the "common but to us unknown root" of sensibility and understanding, but my point is that this not all he does, and to view it this way is to be a bit too reductive. He works at a variety of levels and with a number of different aspects.

I haven't read this but Im certainly going to! Thanks so much for the recommend Rhys!

Has truth revealed itself yet?

Is it a "nasty" moment to have fallen in love with someone who subsequently developed a nasty political position?

Kant was actually a pretty social guy. By today's standards he'd be considered a socialite... Just thought I'd drop that in here

What sort of angle are you taking?

Sounds super interesting! will have to check this out for sure