So them not being able to manipulate is a bad thing? And we should leave because they're not going to be able to?

That's where the "effectively" comes in to play.

Another hot miss from BTC. I need to start keeping a list 😏

And a shit ton of bias 🤡

You quit having a response like 5 replies ago. Poor thing. I'll let you slink back into your hole, thinking you accomplished something today ✌️

From what I've seen, it doesn't happen often for you. Especially on an intellectual level 😬

Guess which side comes with more bias? 🤣

I'm assuming this doesn't mesh well with your newsletter...

news.stanford.edu/stories/2024...

Like you did with Covid?

Coming from the guy who refuses to answer any questions about his world view.

I can see why you enjoy the soft echo chamber you've found. It's way easier to never own your words or have a hill to defend your ideas.

I'd do that too if my ideas were as worthless as yours!

Typical libtard 🤣🤣🤣

I'll take that as a yes. You think it's a valid question.

Your entire side of the argument is toast right there. You don't live in reality 🤣

That's the "own."

You'll never be able to comprehend basic points in any debate because you can't grasp the first principles at all.

Good work!

You're on the wrong side of history.

So in your empty mind, asking the question "Is Sarah McBride a woman?" is an absolutely valid question?

I feel like I'm in a zoo, interviewing a talking sloth to figure out what makes it tick.

You're a specimen.

It's precisely because the answer is obvious that you reject the premise.

This could be said for nearly ANY question!

Please, dear god, don't attempt to practice law... like ever!

When the answer is obvious and a dipshit still asks the question, you're legitimately saying that it automatically comes with a good-faith premise?

You probably think this is a question with a good-faith premise, huh?

When did you stop beating your wife?

I knew you were retarded, but damn!

Resisted so hard they fled to a comfy echo chamber 🤣

There can only be one conclusion. For the 97th time. This is my whole argument

His words exactly are:
"I was asked a question this morning at the leadership gaggle, and I rejected the premise, because the answer is so obvious."
"A man is a man, and a woman is a woman."

youtu.be/toP1d4zm-XI?...

As a republican, I loved it.

Absolutely breathtaking to see the deaf leading the blind and blaming the stairs when they fall down.

And terrible debaters gonna lose debates.

Checkmate.

Oh, sorry, that's a chess term. You know, the wooden board with black and white squares and the figurine that looks like a horsey?

Almost forgot to dumb shit down for you again.