HandsOffCanada
@kidmouser.bsky.social
One point between winner/loser team is not an indication of superior skills. Our Blue Jays made a two-time major league winner team work like hell to stay afloat. And it was pure luck that the two-time winner team won again. I have never seen such perseverance as we saw with the Blue Jays team. ❤️
November 3, 2025 at 1:59 AM
One point between winner/loser team is not an indication of superior skills. Our Blue Jays made a two-time major league winner team work like hell to stay afloat. And it was pure luck that the two-time winner team won again. I have never seen such perseverance as we saw with the Blue Jays team. ❤️
Bill Kelly does what a whole lot more people (aka voters) are now asking about Poilievre.... how would HE solve all the issues & problems he keeps repeating to crowds of angry people? It's one thing to yell: "Our house prices are unbelievable!" It's another to propose solutions for the issue.
November 3, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Bill Kelly does what a whole lot more people (aka voters) are now asking about Poilievre.... how would HE solve all the issues & problems he keeps repeating to crowds of angry people? It's one thing to yell: "Our house prices are unbelievable!" It's another to propose solutions for the issue.
. . . And the need for oil and gas that we are not about to send them any longer. They want bitumen?... let them frack with precious water in their own country.
November 3, 2025 at 1:36 AM
. . . And the need for oil and gas that we are not about to send them any longer. They want bitumen?... let them frack with precious water in their own country.
Wow. I can see how the cost of pharmaceuticals can impact the health of Americans. Our condolences.
November 3, 2025 at 1:24 AM
Wow. I can see how the cost of pharmaceuticals can impact the health of Americans. Our condolences.
Wait until even the lower income earners can afford an EV!
From China.
From China.
a man in a tuxedo says take that in front of a green exit sign
ALT: a man in a tuxedo says take that in front of a green exit sign
media.tenor.com
November 3, 2025 at 1:21 AM
Wait until even the lower income earners can afford an EV!
From China.
From China.
Lose the chastisement... Carney knows that making an unhinged person like Trump angry won't end with any kind of win. Our PM is trying to protect jobs for our people. Where Doug Ford is frustrated and wants the American people to know why.... Carney knows to walk softly and *around* any grenade.
November 3, 2025 at 1:15 AM
Lose the chastisement... Carney knows that making an unhinged person like Trump angry won't end with any kind of win. Our PM is trying to protect jobs for our people. Where Doug Ford is frustrated and wants the American people to know why.... Carney knows to walk softly and *around* any grenade.
Just remember whose cars those EVs would be 'undercutting'. Does Trump give a damn about how many Canadian workers lose their jobs building parts for his American automobiles?
Undercut away!
Undercut away!
November 3, 2025 at 1:04 AM
Just remember whose cars those EVs would be 'undercutting'. Does Trump give a damn about how many Canadian workers lose their jobs building parts for his American automobiles?
Undercut away!
Undercut away!
China has something we need and want - and our farmers have something that China wants. Time past when Canada should arrest someone that the US doesn't like. We took too much of a hit being a good friend to our neighbour. They just didn't reciprocate the friendship. Love our tourism numbers!
November 3, 2025 at 1:01 AM
China has something we need and want - and our farmers have something that China wants. Time past when Canada should arrest someone that the US doesn't like. We took too much of a hit being a good friend to our neighbour. They just didn't reciprocate the friendship. Love our tourism numbers!
This has nothing to do with 'healing'. Some are just a tad tired of that camouflage for what is nothing more than land grab, government money, & culture-specific rights laws.
The case in Richmond BC will blow the whole show out of the water.... because indigenous went too far with their 'healing'.
The case in Richmond BC will blow the whole show out of the water.... because indigenous went too far with their 'healing'.
November 3, 2025 at 12:18 AM
This has nothing to do with 'healing'. Some are just a tad tired of that camouflage for what is nothing more than land grab, government money, & culture-specific rights laws.
The case in Richmond BC will blow the whole show out of the water.... because indigenous went too far with their 'healing'.
The case in Richmond BC will blow the whole show out of the water.... because indigenous went too far with their 'healing'.
That Commission was made solely of indigenous, who got together with other indigenous and documented stories about what life was like within residential schools. It was not vetted for truth, accuracy or even sources. "Call to action" all you like... but not based on parties that are not impartial.
November 3, 2025 at 12:14 AM
That Commission was made solely of indigenous, who got together with other indigenous and documented stories about what life was like within residential schools. It was not vetted for truth, accuracy or even sources. "Call to action" all you like... but not based on parties that are not impartial.
It is NOT your job, as an indigenous defender, to think that any perceived 'historical wrongs' give a right to indigenous to own land without limitations of the Crown, as for the rest of Canada's populations. Also, THIS generation is not responsible for your version of history or wrongs.
November 3, 2025 at 12:08 AM
It is NOT your job, as an indigenous defender, to think that any perceived 'historical wrongs' give a right to indigenous to own land without limitations of the Crown, as for the rest of Canada's populations. Also, THIS generation is not responsible for your version of history or wrongs.
That "win" could be the start of the end of such land claims in future. All lands, when we purchase them from other owners or even government, are 'subject to' the Crown. That means NO ONE has clear, unchecked ownership of the lands, which can be subject to expropriation or government limitations.
November 3, 2025 at 12:02 AM
That "win" could be the start of the end of such land claims in future. All lands, when we purchase them from other owners or even government, are 'subject to' the Crown. That means NO ONE has clear, unchecked ownership of the lands, which can be subject to expropriation or government limitations.
I think most people have long ago decided 'reconciliation' was the wrong term being used for what was happening with the demands from indigenous. Now it's escalated to whether indigenous land title can supersede the Crown's title - which applies to ALL of our properties under the present system.
November 2, 2025 at 11:56 PM
I think most people have long ago decided 'reconciliation' was the wrong term being used for what was happening with the demands from indigenous. Now it's escalated to whether indigenous land title can supersede the Crown's title - which applies to ALL of our properties under the present system.
First Nation land title:
This case is being appealed by three levels of government, +
The parties appealing the Cowichan land title case are
the federal and provincial governments, the City of Richmond, the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, and the Musqueam Indian Band and Tsawwassen First Nation.
This case is being appealed by three levels of government, +
The parties appealing the Cowichan land title case are
the federal and provincial governments, the City of Richmond, the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, and the Musqueam Indian Band and Tsawwassen First Nation.
November 2, 2025 at 11:52 PM
First Nation land title:
This case is being appealed by three levels of government, +
The parties appealing the Cowichan land title case are
the federal and provincial governments, the City of Richmond, the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, and the Musqueam Indian Band and Tsawwassen First Nation.
This case is being appealed by three levels of government, +
The parties appealing the Cowichan land title case are
the federal and provincial governments, the City of Richmond, the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, and the Musqueam Indian Band and Tsawwassen First Nation.
Key aspects of Section 35
Duty to consult:
The government has a duty to consult with Indigenous groups and, where appropriate, accommodate them when its actions may adversely affect their established or potential Aboriginal or treaty rights.
Duty to consult:
The government has a duty to consult with Indigenous groups and, where appropriate, accommodate them when its actions may adversely affect their established or potential Aboriginal or treaty rights.
November 2, 2025 at 11:47 PM
Key aspects of Section 35
Duty to consult:
The government has a duty to consult with Indigenous groups and, where appropriate, accommodate them when its actions may adversely affect their established or potential Aboriginal or treaty rights.
Duty to consult:
The government has a duty to consult with Indigenous groups and, where appropriate, accommodate them when its actions may adversely affect their established or potential Aboriginal or treaty rights.
Only when it is something that affects lands that have been legally recognized as their "traditional lands". They cannot stop a project that may have ancillary effects on their lands, but not direct and immediate effects.
November 2, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Only when it is something that affects lands that have been legally recognized as their "traditional lands". They cannot stop a project that may have ancillary effects on their lands, but not direct and immediate effects.
"From" Israel? Is that why Netanyahu keeps making trips to the US during his assaults on Gaza.... to GIVE the Americans money and arms supply? 🤔
November 2, 2025 at 10:25 PM
"From" Israel? Is that why Netanyahu keeps making trips to the US during his assaults on Gaza.... to GIVE the Americans money and arms supply? 🤔
Or short nickname: Boss
November 2, 2025 at 10:17 PM
Or short nickname: Boss
Wow. I don't know what you said to him.... but I don't advise saying it again.
November 2, 2025 at 10:16 PM
Wow. I don't know what you said to him.... but I don't advise saying it again.
Watch you mouth 😠. . .
A connoisseur of all things edible. 😒
A connoisseur of all things edible. 😒
November 2, 2025 at 10:15 PM
Watch you mouth 😠. . .
A connoisseur of all things edible. 😒
A connoisseur of all things edible. 😒
Tortoiseshell? If so, you are not the owner of her.... she owns you and everything around you.
November 2, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Tortoiseshell? If so, you are not the owner of her.... she owns you and everything around you.
Hardly a military turning on its own citizens.... These are incidents where armed groups have either killed or taken hostage citizens. And if they are province-wide armed groups, such as the FLQ crisis, military had to be called in just because of large area needing control. Never like US bs.
October 31, 2025 at 11:53 PM
Hardly a military turning on its own citizens.... These are incidents where armed groups have either killed or taken hostage citizens. And if they are province-wide armed groups, such as the FLQ crisis, military had to be called in just because of large area needing control. Never like US bs.
If police need backup for any crisis they cannot handle - usually involving an armed group that threatens unarmed citizens - they've called in military. But more often our military served as support for fighting wildfires or floods or even for those stranded without care during the Covid crisis.
October 31, 2025 at 11:48 PM
If police need backup for any crisis they cannot handle - usually involving an armed group that threatens unarmed citizens - they've called in military. But more often our military served as support for fighting wildfires or floods or even for those stranded without care during the Covid crisis.
We've had lots of 'crises' before. They were handled by local police or, if involving serious threat to citizens, military backup for the police:
October 31, 2025 at 11:38 PM
We've had lots of 'crises' before. They were handled by local police or, if involving serious threat to citizens, military backup for the police:
Details please. If you're referring to the trucker occupation of Ottawa, it was used to reinforce police which did not have the capacity to dismantle the months-long siege on the city. The 'citizens' were not citizens of the city. They were occupiers from other provinces that crippled the city.
October 31, 2025 at 11:32 PM
Details please. If you're referring to the trucker occupation of Ottawa, it was used to reinforce police which did not have the capacity to dismantle the months-long siege on the city. The 'citizens' were not citizens of the city. They were occupiers from other provinces that crippled the city.