Many geo-politico-economic intents have been inferred in other genocides, precluding the logic that a genocide can only occur if solely motivated by a pure desire to destroy a group."

The legal standard, “only reasonable inference”, means that the inference of a genocidal intent is inescapable, not that genocide is the sole intent to be inferred i.e. ‘only’ is used not in its numerical sense, but in its emphatic sense of certainty.

genocidal intent. Third, the killings and infliction of extreme group conditions of life in Gaza constitute a pattern of conduct that could only point to a genocidal intent.

Second, Israel’s State policy, culminating in or influenced by the ‘Generals’ Plan’ presented to the Israeli Parliament in October 2024, to target Gazans who remain in ‘closed military zones’ when they are prevented by road closures, military operations and other hazards from leaving, also indicates

These statements evince the intent to adopt extremely severe measures (including starvation, wholesale destruction and constant forcible displacement in a sealed, indiscriminately bombed territory) that will necessarily result in the Gazans’ ‘slow death’.

The indication in some of these statements of a parallel intent to avoid harming non-Hamas members does not negate genocidal intent – the genocidaires in Srebrenica intentionally spared women, girls and non-military age young boys and elderly men.

Reasons: "The genocidal intent can be established on three bases. First, statements made by Israeli officials, whose conduct is attributable to Israel, disclose the intent to physically or biologically destroy the Palestinians in Gaza.

Final judgment: "Israel’s conduct in and in relation to Gaza meet the requirements of genocide." Reasons: "The genocidal intent can be established on three bases.

Truly fantastic, what an honour!