This puts everyone on record. Either you think victims of child sex trafficking deserve justice, or you think powerful people should stay protected by illegal deals. Pick a side.
So what am I missing?
This puts everyone on record. Either you think victims of child sex trafficking deserve justice, or you think powerful people should stay protected by illegal deals. Pick a side.
So what am I missing?
The man who campaigned on “lock her up” suddenly doesn’t want to lock up Epstein’s
The man who campaigned on “lock her up” suddenly doesn’t want to lock up Epstein’s
The key may be to frame it narrowly. Perhaps not every old case. Just ones involving sexual abuse of minors where victims were illegally excluded and it actually mattered to the outcome. That’s basically the Epstein deal and maybe a handful of others.
The key may be to frame it narrowly. Perhaps not every old case. Just ones involving sexual abuse of minors where victims were illegally excluded and it actually mattered to the outcome. That’s basically the Epstein deal and maybe a handful of others.
And think about it, what Senator wants to go on record defending a deal that protected Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirators? What House member wants to explain
And think about it, what Senator wants to go on record defending a deal that protected Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirators? What House member wants to explain
Legally, when prosecutors gave Epstein’s buddies immunity, they broke federal law by excluding the victims. Courts can already
Legally, when prosecutors gave Epstein’s buddies immunity, they broke federal law by excluding the victims. Courts can already