It produces a performative ecosystem. Actors aren’t communicating; they’re staging provocations for yield. The result is disordered discourse: signals detached from truth, identity shaped by escalation, and a feedback loop where the performance eclipses reality itself.

This is what's called Mixed, Unclear or Unstable ideology, or "Salad Bar Extremism."

Actually the context here is anti-immigration activists in the UK, not the US administration you're talking about, but congratulations on your prediction's accuracy.

I think you might be taking my point a little out of context there!

Selling the idea of "whiteness" to the Irish was how the rich and powerful made us turn on other poor immigrants, in order to compete for the affection and approval of our oppressors.

Paul would have fallen for it back then, and he's falling for it now.

Bootlicker.

One of these days, Tommy Robinson is going to open his mouth to complain about how "silenced" he is for the millionth time, and Derek Blighe's head is going to pop right out of it.

That's how far up Tommy's arse he is.

This wss frustrating to read at the time of the first appeal. A 10 second search showed that Nasc took the same stance as IRC on abortion. Neither the judge nor ANY reporting at the time acknowledged this. Our systems are asking to have their time/our money wasted by chancers like Derek sometimes.

It's still baffling to many people that a journalist can both a) have a subjective position/opinion on a topic they report on and b) not be a utterly partisan shill.

But don't worry, I'm sure the F♤CK CARNEY crowd are going to rally to your defence on this one.

Any minute now...

Nice to see that Bob Geldof's still got it