Shridhar
@jupyterai.bsky.social
PhD in ML at ETH Zurich
Interested in Reasoning, Distillation, Refinement, Agents and everything else in LLMs
https://kumar-shridhar.github.io/
Interested in Reasoning, Distillation, Refinement, Agents and everything else in LLMs
https://kumar-shridhar.github.io/
Reposted by Shridhar
a good review from a smart person is great but nothing hits quite like a bad review from an idiot
November 25, 2024 at 5:55 AM
a good review from a smart person is great but nothing hits quite like a bad review from an idiot
Reposted by Shridhar
I've never, personally, had any direct utility from traditional academic peer review for my scientific work.
I've never used that peer review as any kind of signal or credential in judging a paper or deciding whether to read it.
Nearly all the papers I read are preprints.
I've never used that peer review as any kind of signal or credential in judging a paper or deciding whether to read it.
Nearly all the papers I read are preprints.
November 25, 2024 at 2:01 AM
I've never, personally, had any direct utility from traditional academic peer review for my scientific work.
I've never used that peer review as any kind of signal or credential in judging a paper or deciding whether to read it.
Nearly all the papers I read are preprints.
I've never used that peer review as any kind of signal or credential in judging a paper or deciding whether to read it.
Nearly all the papers I read are preprints.
Reposted by Shridhar
Reviewing is dead.
I just read some ICLR reviews. Absolutely junk. No insight. Written by humans, but could have been written by a chatbot or teenager who had read a few dozen reviews.
Why do we think this is useful? Only 5% (if that!) of the community has worthwhile opinions.
I just read some ICLR reviews. Absolutely junk. No insight. Written by humans, but could have been written by a chatbot or teenager who had read a few dozen reviews.
Why do we think this is useful? Only 5% (if that!) of the community has worthwhile opinions.
November 23, 2024 at 7:01 PM
Reviewing is dead.
I just read some ICLR reviews. Absolutely junk. No insight. Written by humans, but could have been written by a chatbot or teenager who had read a few dozen reviews.
Why do we think this is useful? Only 5% (if that!) of the community has worthwhile opinions.
I just read some ICLR reviews. Absolutely junk. No insight. Written by humans, but could have been written by a chatbot or teenager who had read a few dozen reviews.
Why do we think this is useful? Only 5% (if that!) of the community has worthwhile opinions.
An #ICLR reviewer shared that they won’t reply to author rebuttals because no reviewers reply to theirs. The cycle of silence continues.
November 23, 2024 at 7:16 AM
An #ICLR reviewer shared that they won’t reply to author rebuttals because no reviewers reply to theirs. The cycle of silence continues.