Julie Faenza
@juliemfaenza.bsky.social
She/her. Attorney, unaffiliated progressive political junkie. Barbershop, short form improv, & animal shelter volunteer. TRIPLE zebra. Raleigh, NC.🏳️🌈🎶♿️
Same energy as "There are so many more Republicans than Democrats!" in relation to a map like this...
November 26, 2025 at 1:54 PM
Same energy as "There are so many more Republicans than Democrats!" in relation to a map like this...
Aurora in Youngsville NC!
November 13, 2025 at 2:46 AM
Aurora in Youngsville NC!
Practicing government attorney.
DOOO EEEET
DOOO EEEET
November 1, 2025 at 2:28 PM
Practicing government attorney.
DOOO EEEET
DOOO EEEET
Fixed it for you.
September 19, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Fixed it for you.
Shit, what would you even know about criminal defense law either?!
September 17, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Shit, what would you even know about criminal defense law either?!
This just went off on my phone (and all the phones around me) like an Amber Alert. What the fuck is this?
September 13, 2025 at 8:24 PM
This just went off on my phone (and all the phones around me) like an Amber Alert. What the fuck is this?
He might actually have a trans kid, but since it's his trans son, apparently trans women are still disposable.
September 2, 2025 at 5:14 PM
He might actually have a trans kid, but since it's his trans son, apparently trans women are still disposable.
But I'll point out this. An article that is supposedly being used to explain why only two sexes developed probably isn't going to start by saying this was absolutely not the only path possible and it's entirely possible to imagine life on earth without separate sexes.
August 29, 2025 at 3:03 PM
But I'll point out this. An article that is supposedly being used to explain why only two sexes developed probably isn't going to start by saying this was absolutely not the only path possible and it's entirely possible to imagine life on earth without separate sexes.
Personally, I think it's because he's flailing madly after unintentionally proving sex is bimodal by adopting the definition in the glossary, but that's just me.
August 29, 2025 at 1:52 PM
Personally, I think it's because he's flailing madly after unintentionally proving sex is bimodal by adopting the definition in the glossary, but that's just me.
He didn't read the whole glossary either.
August 29, 2025 at 1:14 PM
He didn't read the whole glossary either.
Unfortunately for you, you apparently didn't read the whole glossary.
August 29, 2025 at 1:13 PM
Unfortunately for you, you apparently didn't read the whole glossary.
So you didn't even read the article. 😂😂😂😂
August 29, 2025 at 1:08 PM
So you didn't even read the article. 😂😂😂😂
For the inevitable block
August 29, 2025 at 1:33 AM
For the inevitable block
The raw irony of this on my browser as I read about this.
August 28, 2025 at 3:03 PM
The raw irony of this on my browser as I read about this.
In case you can't access the link.
August 25, 2025 at 5:58 PM
In case you can't access the link.
This is you, right?
August 10, 2025 at 2:34 AM
This is you, right?
This is you, right?
August 7, 2025 at 5:15 PM
This is you, right?
