Jason Modisette
jpmodisette.bsky.social
Jason Modisette
@jpmodisette.bsky.social
I make computer simulations of oil, gas, water, and other sorts of pipelines. My background is in physics. I do: mountain biking, hiking, propane flame effects, TTRPGs, various art.
It took me several reads to understand that you had not built a pretty accurate scale model in the dessert.
January 27, 2025 at 9:21 PM
I knew it! Now I will be paranoid again.
January 25, 2025 at 9:21 AM
Trump ought to be advertising this everywhere. It makes $TRUMP a great purchase for memecoin investors - every time Trump gets a bribe, you get part of it!
January 22, 2025 at 8:10 PM
May be a depressing read for actual high-energy physicists. Otoh, excellent schadenfreude for condensed-matter physicists who don't get to partake in those huge particle accelerator budgets.

Hossenfelder also has a fun podcast on YouTube. (5 of 5)
January 22, 2025 at 2:28 PM
Hossenfelder does not do the usual nonfiction thing where she repeats a point over and over in different ways. For big chunks of the book, she makes a point in one sentence, then makes another point that builds on it in the next sentence, then maybe a sentence of snark, then another point. (4 of n)
January 22, 2025 at 2:27 PM
Her writing style is very entertaining. I can pretty much follow it, and while I do have a degree in physics, I did condensed matter rather than high energy, so I know as little about the standard model as an enthusiastic non-physicist would. The book is nominally for the layman. (3 of n)
January 22, 2025 at 2:26 PM
Hossenfelder talks about how this is not the scientific method, and about the long history of beautiful theories being wrong (and, of course, being right). The heliocentric model of the Solar System was rejected for valid-seeming reasons of beauty that are not the ones you would expect. (2 of n)
January 22, 2025 at 2:26 PM