instead, tell them to cite other people's papers - that'll throw them off the scent!

more importantly, no placebo group?!

given the paucity of what we can capture, 40% variance explained really isn't bad

I found this illuminating

You forgot about when KL said Hitler "was supporting Zionism before he went mad". There's no comparison, whatever you think of his politics on I-P, Mandami made every effort to reach out to the mainstream NY Jewish community. KL avoided Jews (other than on the far-left) as much as possible

Can't rival your colour just yet but our wild service trees are on their way

alternative theory - people are lazy, and just use the software package/approach that they already know and gives the "best" results. Editors need to start systematically rejecting papers using flawed techniques - which is how we solved shoddy multiple comparisons correction in fMRI 10 years ago

is it "the economy, stupid"?

oy, come back Tzipi all is forgiven

this is just absolutely bonkers - scary how quickly race science has emerged as a talking point on the right

huge congratulations!

very interesting

it may be of interest that, surprisingly, we previously found no impairment in either model-based planning or pruning in clinically depressed individuals pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...