jonnyswift8.bsky.social
@jonnyswift8.bsky.social
Pragmatic liberal
Reposted
it is truly insane how low information the average american is. they're just ripping everything off of the walls while slowly building camps and deporting their enemies but the average person will say you're being a drama queen, politics never change, etc.
March 28, 2025 at 4:26 AM
Because it is in all of their best interests to defend themselves against trumps attacks on the rule of law? It is incredibly weird.
March 28, 2025 at 4:19 PM
What’s Trumps beef with maduro? They both seem like they would like each other.
March 23, 2025 at 1:13 PM
There were also like 15 candidates in 2020 lol
March 22, 2025 at 12:37 PM
Reposted
4/🧵 The pattern diverges from what @mayasen.bsky.social and I found during Trump's first term, when judge ideology strongly predicted case outcomes. What changed? The nature of the challenges—today's cases pose more fundamental constitutional violations uniting judges across partisan divides.
March 18, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Reposted
5/🧵 Trump's attacks on judges—including Republican appointees—for unfavorable rulings reveals an authoritarian assault that should alarm us all. Demanding judicial loyalty over constitutional fidelity represents a dangerous erosion of separation of powers, the cornerstone of our Madisonian republic.
March 18, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Reposted
3/🧵 Modeling the outcomes with a logistic regression confirms that judicial ideology doesn't predict ruling outcomes. This isn't commonly the case—ideology is typically a moderate to strong predictor of case outcomes, making this ideological consensus particularly noteworthy.
March 18, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Reposted
2/🧵 Here is the breakdown by ideological groupings. While liberal judges heard more cases (due to geography and venue selection), the consistency of rulings across ideological lines demolishes the narrative that judicial decisions against Trump reflect political bias.
March 18, 2025 at 9:32 PM
It’s like Republicans Generalplan ost, if we still have free and fair elections in 26
March 18, 2025 at 3:01 AM
Reposted
It occurs to me from a real game theory perspective that what "they" anticipate is that a decentralized, post national American oligarchy will naturally cause China and Russia's oligarchy to fragment - it's not about undermining the other guys elections it's about finessing his oligarchs
March 16, 2025 at 10:23 PM
Reposted
2/ My big beef is that I cannot seem to find out how to turn off this annoying "help me write" prompt in Gmail. And for us, this isn't a free service for which we're supposed to be the product. We purchase it. We use the enterprise edition. But it still appears to be impossible to disable.
March 17, 2025 at 3:14 AM
Reposted
I think everyone just kind of accepted that shit sucked and tried to move on from it.

Helps that Vietnam immediately had a more pressing foe in the form of China.
March 15, 2025 at 7:45 PM
Reposted
I'd couch it more, in that media is *inherently* right wing the same way Oil is.

Small business owners and private contractors *everywhere*.
March 15, 2025 at 11:50 PM